Back to @tyler's profile

Tyler Winklevoss engagement report

@tyler - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.37%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
3.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
157
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.93/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 116x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tyler Winklevoss's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Tyler Winklevoss sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,037 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 2026116x their median

    Windows 95 was launched this day 31 years ago https://t.co/KoPrnQpLSe

    15K1.6K1.2K7593.4M viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 202672x their median

    When Emily Wilson published her translation of The Odyssey, it quietly but decisively shifted how many readers understood one of the foundations of Western literature. For centuries, English versions of the poem had been shaped by male translators who often filtered Homer’s Greek through Victorian, Edwardian, or mid-20th Century assumptions about gender, class, and morality. Wilson approached the text with a different aim: fidelity not to tradition, but to the language itself. Her translation pays close attention to what the Greek actually says, rather than what earlier translators assumed it meant. Where previous versions softened Odysseus into a noble hero or exaggerated the moral failings of female characters, Wilson strips away editorial judgment. Words that had long been rendered with moralizing or misogynistic overtones—especially when applied to women, servants, or the enslaved—are reexamined and translated with consistency and precision. A term describing women as sexually suspect, for example, is no longer quietly upgraded to “faithful” or “pure” when it suits male sympathy. Equally important is what Wilson avoids. She resists anachronistic language that romanticizes violence, hierarchy, or domination. Her Odysseus is clever and ruthless, not automatically admirable; Penelope is intelligent and strategic, not merely patient and chaste. Enslaved women are named as enslaved, not euphemized into “maids,” forcing modern readers to confront the social realities the poem assumes rather than smoothing them away for comfort. Wilson’s choices don’t modernize Homer—they clarify him. By refusing to insert gendered judgment or inherited bias, her translation reveals how much earlier versions reflected the values of their translators rather than the ancient text. The result is an Odyssey that feels sharper, more unsettling, and more honest: a poem about power, survival, and storytelling itself, finally allowed to speak without centuries of moral varnish. © Reddit #archaeohistories

    9.5K9678032716.4M viewsView on X
  • Jan 2, 202644x their median

    On this day, 63 years ago, Federico Fellini's "8½" (1963) premiered in Acapulco film festival, Mexico. https://t.co/wdwqQGl9AT

    6.1K8464276215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202641x their median

    Steve Jobs literally predicted the iPhone, the Internet, AI and the next 50 years of technology in a single speech from 1983: https://t.co/qSfPW3FBUp

    5.2K1.1K6896869K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202629x their median

    26 years ago today, Age of Empires II: The Conquerors arrived on PC. Back when an expansion pack could feel like an entirely new game. Big PC box, CRT monitor, hours disappearing before you even realized it. Still one of the best eras of PC gaming. https://t.co/KCPKFB6iVF

    4.0K35111353133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202614x their median

    Big news for the Ripple Army in Asia. @Gemini users in Singapore 🇸🇬 can now deposit and withdraw XRP over the XRPL network.

    1.7K2937328141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202613x their median

    There are more millionaires in the world than there are whole units of Zcash. 60 million millionaires and only 21 million ZEC. Think about it.

    1.3K10149263282K viewsView on X
  • Nov 12, 20257.1x their median

    hello, world

    7979218349874K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.2x their median

    So happy for Zcash developers, community, and believers. Long and unwavering conviction in the worth. Now being recognized more broadly.

    2981918550K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.0x their median

    Prediction markets will disrupt legacy media

    2462240335K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.37% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 116x its own typical post.

What is Tyler Winklevoss's engagement rate on X?
Tyler Winklevoss (@tyler) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,101,862 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Tyler Winklevoss sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tyler have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tyler post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going