PlayerSells
Back to @twetsfyp's profile

me engagement report

@twetsfyp - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.211%
142K views on a typical post
Reach
9.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
300
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
128 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 300 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 142K times each, and 0.211% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #creatify, #creatifystudio.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #ad, #creatify, #creatifystudio.

Compared with accounts its own size

me's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, me sits above the 25th percentile of the 10,480 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.007% to 0.048%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.048%
p750.326%
p902.49%
p99353.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,480 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 442,149 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.048%
75th percentile0.326%
90th percentile2.49%
99th percentile353.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link38% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 202678x their median

    AI is advancing too fast https://t.co/HMapAzbXm8

    22K1.1K1395518M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202629x their median

    el ingeniero que construyΓ³ Claude Code acaba de publicar un video de 28 minutos sobre cΓ³mo escribir prompts que realmente funcionan he visto cursos de 300$ que no cubren lo que Γ©l muestra en los primeros 5 minutos todo en un video y completamente gratis https://t.co/Le7EpOXGtO

    7.5K1.3K84241.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202628x their median

    My second job with AI generates $4,921 per week for me. I wrote a detailed guide to help you get started and earn $300 every day. FREE only for 24h! Only: 1. Like 2. Comment β€œSend” 3. Follow me to receive the DM https://t.co/mvGflaZcaH

    4.1K3543.8K16341K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202624x their median

    Mito Claude is back in an insane way This is a 16-minute tutorial on how to create $50,000 cinematic websites (step by step) with Claude Fable 5 https://t.co/ZiHJvpEbJB

    6.6K46043192.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202610x their median

    Today, we’re launching Bland Speech v3 - The world's first Human Speech Engine. In @designarena’s Audio Realism benchmark, Speech v3 is the top model, outranking Elevenlabs, Grok, Cartesia, and OpenAI. Trained on over 100 million real, human conversations: businesses, developers, and creators can now create any audio they can imagine. To showcase this, we used 5 seconds of old footage to help James, a 49 year old father who recently suffered a stroke, get his voice back. Try it for free at https://t.co/lr96zcKLbq Full length documentary below🧡

    2.3K3132392232.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202610x their median

    Stanford has just leaked this free class that explains how claude and chatgpt work from the inside The majority wastes 90% of its potential Stanford teaches it to you in 1h50 minutes Save this to favorites so you don’t lose it​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​. https://t.co/Esw79hrJ0B

    2.6K3842872.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20269.9x their median

    This guy in 16 minutes that teaches you how to monetize a YouTube channel in only 9 days. Save it; it will be useful to you https://t.co/tWil0TzwV3

    2.6K357347201K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20268.0x their median

    but this is really surprising https://t.co/5f0MctLRUB

    2.3K86292232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20266.4x their median

    This guy in 47 minutes teaches you how to monetize a YouTube channel with AI without showing your face. πŸ”– Save it; it will be useful to you.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ https://t.co/15i9nFEozw

    1.6K354187108K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20265.7x their median

    This guy in 17 minutes shows you the EASIEST way to generate $115,000 per month with youtube in 2026 Here I leave you this complete tutorial⬇️ https://t.co/CBe08oupOh

    1.4K224322109K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad#creatify#creatifystudio#d2cmarketing#marketingtips

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 300 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 142K times each, and 0.211% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #creatify, #creatifystudio.

What is me's engagement rate on X?
me (@twetsfyp) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,524,888 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, me sits above the 25th percentile of the 10,480 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @twetsfyp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @twetsfyp post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going