Back to @tushy_com's profile

TUSHY engagement report

@tushy_com - 461K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.081%
of 461K followers
Per impression
1.19%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
6.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
374
interactions (median)
Saved
0.201%
63 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 374 interactions against 461K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #lizjordan.

Compared with accounts its own size

TUSHY's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.081%, TUSHY sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20263.7x their median

    Say less 😌 @Evaangelina ft. @DanDamageX & @AJonesXXX https://t.co/HLeg8muno7

    1.3K726059K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.6x their median

    Can you guess what she wants to try? 😈 New TUSHY scene with @maddiewrenx x @Vincexxxx releasing 9/6! https://t.co/7EedReZ2k8 https://t.co/KVB7auIiz4

    1.3K67322160K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.1x their median

    Sometimes you can use more than just a listening ear πŸ˜‰ @maddiewrenx x @Vincexxxx https://t.co/UUL1JFURI4 https://t.co/UrMpZyZXaR

    1.1K6610035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.9x their median

    The icons, the legends; all in one DVD 🀩 Ft. @ItsAlinaLopez, @annaclairecloud, #LizJordan, @milancheek, @willowryder Get it hereπŸ‘‰ https://t.co/c2YdaBQLGk https://t.co/C1QuQrCUyR

    1.0K688028K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20262.6x their median

    Your VIXEN era starts here πŸ’― We’re looking for new female talent to feature in upcoming Vixen Media Group productions 🎬 Submit your application below ⬇️ https://t.co/cpoT8ePJ0v https://t.co/xg5MeTIWll

    775681172655K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.5x their median

    Sometimes you just have to use your imagination... but not with @riverlynnxxx πŸ‘€ https://t.co/4AcadPIOXD

    875389046K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.2x their median

    Run, don't walk to this new scene dropping this Sunday! @maddiewrenx x @Vincexxxx https://t.co/UUL1JFURI4 https://t.co/iKLo3cVx3i

    7735414033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.9x their median

    Perfection 🀩 @Angiechatur https://t.co/PnosDqWC8p https://t.co/VNgfR7B9vt

    6862911040K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.9x their median

    The dream team πŸ˜‡ @Sirena_Milano & @PollyYangsbp https://t.co/GKX36x6RzG https://t.co/1onJWQgJF1

    669304031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.5x their median

    Dream date πŸ˜‡ @Evaangelina x @DanDamageX x @AJonesXXX https://t.co/4LXPNYZHdV

    5273412043K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lizjordan

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 374 interactions against 461K followers, an engagement rate of 0.081%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is TUSHY's engagement rate on X?
TUSHY (@tushy_com) has an engagement rate of 0.081%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 460,833 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.081%, TUSHY sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tushy_com have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tushy_com post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going