Back to @trunksRM7's profile

(fan) Trunks engagement report

@trunksRM7 - 247K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.05%
of 247K followers
Per impression
2.93%
88K views on a typical post
Reach
36.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
34 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.43/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 1.05%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

(fan) Trunks's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.05%, (fan) Trunks sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.705% to 2.63%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,501 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202612x their median

    Eres old pero, así de old? https://t.co/qLddIOenP9

    29K1.2K276266K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.2x their median

    Ojalá fueras así con Gavi y con Yamal.. Hijo de puta. https://t.co/0hMWUCLCgJ

    15K1.2K19131341K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.0x their median

    Con razón Rodri y Guardiola tenían tanta prisa por salir del city jajaja. Par de cagones.

    15K669508330K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.8x their median

    Mourinho ha mandado a imprimir las dos rojas no pitadas para la conferencia de prensa Jajajajajajajajajajajaja. https://t.co/UhNqQoAjTB

    11K69219370181K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.6x their median

    Gracias.. Gracias por ser el único capaz de dar dos pases seguidos y tener idea de crear juego, contigo en el campo 8 minutos casi nos llevamos un empate... Gracias y perdón porque juegue Camavinga antes que tu.. Este club es así de disfuncional. https://t.co/yjxajS0hay

    11K67713021183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.1x their median

    Uno ha ganado 2 Champions y un Balón de Oro. https://t.co/Lm1YKNjUtm

    10K30914630974K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.8x their median

    Te voy a extrañar cada día de mi vida. https://t.co/P7GH8IMz2J

    8.9K978514188K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.3x their median

    Pillas una borrachera bestial en Gran Canaria, al punto de cuadruplicar el máximo penal permitido de alcohol en sangre, y aun así tienes los cojones de pillar el coche y conducir... A este tío le da igual su carrera, le da igual toda la inversión millonaria que un club hizo en el arriesgandose a un accidente, le da igual su familia y le da igual la vida de los demás.. Es un pobre diablo que la fama y el dinero le ha quedado grande.. Fuera del club ya.

    8.2K25311311456K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.2x their median

    Ah que se fue a cenar el muy hijo de puta después del partido. Que cene en su puta casa. Que Cristiano se quedaba encerrado en su habitación después de perder, dicho por él. A Mbappé le tengo un nivel de asco rozando el que me dan Piqué y Messi. https://t.co/cTdl3jOHdE

    6.9K610622149961K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.1x their median

    Que barbaridad de persona.. Intenso como un perro de presa y dejándose hasta el alma en cada acción.. Dame 11 Cucurellas.. Estoy seguro que acabará siendo capitán en unos años. https://t.co/ujDsN55yXE

    7.5K34262869K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 247K followers, an engagement rate of 1.05%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 88K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is (fan) Trunks's engagement rate on X?
(fan) Trunks (@trunksRM7) has an engagement rate of 1.05%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,799 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.05%, (fan) Trunks sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @trunksRM7 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @trunksRM7 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going