Back to @trish_regan's profile

Trish Regan engagement report

@trish_regan - 710K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 710K followers
Per impression
1.49%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
226
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 710K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 420x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Trish Regan's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, Trish Regan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link64% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 64% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 17, 2026420x their median

    🚨 NOW: NBC, CBS and ABC face MASS calls to have their FCC privilege licenses reexamined or REVOKED after they refuse to air President Trump's primetime, bombshell address surrounding elections tonight Are they COLLUDING to filter and censor the President of the United States? What are they afraid of?! Good thing X is the media now! IT WILL ALL COME OUT and the people will find out anyway.

    70K21K3.4K9382.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026137x their median

    Nothing will prepare you for the national anthem at the first women’s professional baseball game. And I mean nothing. https://t.co/68tCZXvB4Q

    24K2.2K3.8K9043.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202684x their median

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says he won't let businesses operate in his city unless company leaders "reflect the diversity of the community" This sounds both racist and illegal @AAGDhillon https://t.co/WcLnLA8zPE

    14K3.1K1.7K279339K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202646x their median

    Pretty rewarding to see The Trish Regan Show ranked the #4 MOST-VIEWED conservative political channel on YouTube for the quarter — just two spots behind Fox News. After Fox Business fired me, I started over by myself — building from the ground up, one viewer at a time. It’s taken hard work and persistence to get here. Feels especially fitting to read this report on Labor Day weekend. ⬇️ Thank you to everyone who watches and supports the show. Just getting started! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/CkOfaMKMwf⁠

    8.8K1.3K17428119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202636x their median

    You got to be kidding me… This is TEXAS!!! We need some CAPITALISTS to enter the room! ASAP. It would be a tragedy if this tremendous oil-rich, no income tax state fell into the hands of woke socialist wannabes like little Jimmy Talarico. https://t.co/XMPXRJyLjc

    5.4K1.7K841134114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202635x their median

    Canada wants a trade war with Trump? Here’s the actual math Ottawa can’t ignore: 🇺🇸 The U.S. buys roughly $404 BILLION in Canadian goods. That makes America a market roughly 16X the size of China for Canadian exports — and about 2.3X the REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED!! Canada can talk tough about Washington. But these numbers tell you EXACTLY who has ALL the leverage.

    5.4K1.9K502138208K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202627x their median

    🇪🇸🇲🇦 Dozens of migrants from the Ceuta surge were transferred to mainland Spain today. The process of moving people from the enclave into the rest of the country continues. Once on the mainland, they'll soon spread into all of Europe. Writer: Oliver https://t.co/OC8RRXnE9z

    4.2K1.6K338117178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202625x their median

    🚨FOX’S $2.7 BILLION MISTAKE?! Why DUMPING Maria Bartiromo May Put ENTIRE NETWORK at Risk Join Me LIVE! https://t.co/Ku6JB6bmXW

    4.5K1.0K2032699K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202625x their median

    Maria Bartiromo is an extraordinary interviewer, a gifted host, and one of the hardest-working people in our business. I was fortunate to have her as a colleague at both FOX and CNBC—and I have no doubt she’ll continue to do great things! Wishing you nothing but the best, @MariaBartiromo.

    5.0K510120640K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202621x their median

    Rather insane that we need a Primetime Presidential Address to get states to mandate IDENTIFICATION at the voting booths…. We need to insist on voter ids. Period.

    4.2K45637437K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 710K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 420x its own typical post.

What is Trish Regan's engagement rate on X?
Trish Regan (@trish_regan) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 710,175 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, Trish Regan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @trish_regan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @trish_regan post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going