Back to @toshio_tamogami's profile

田母神俊雄 engagement report

@toshio_tamogami - 446K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.461%
of 446K followers
Per impression
4.66%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
9.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.461%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 4.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

田母神俊雄's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.461%, 田母神俊雄 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 174 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202617x their median

    今日本には412万人の外国人が住んでいるという。コンビニなどの店員も外国人が多い。もうこれ以上外国人を増やして欲しくない気がする。安い労働力を使いたい経済界の希望はあるのだろうが、これからは日本人で社会が成り立つことを考えてもらいたい。日本国民がこれほど貧しい生活をしているのに日本国が外国人の生活の面倒を見る必要はない。日本人の完全失業者は今年5月現在で185万人もいる。労働力が足りないというのは嘘なのではないか。

    29K5.6K4852131.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20268.2x their median

    我が国では現在、外国人労働力を使わないと十分な労働力が確保できないという前提で話が進む。英仏独などヨーロッパ諸国は移民問題で失敗しているのに我が国もその後追いをするのか。外国人労働力を使わなくても間に合うように仕事の総量を抑えればよい。外国人のために日本の国が仕事を作ってやる必要はない。株主資本主義が行き過ぎて安い労働力を使いたいということが外国人入国者数を増やしている。そして日本人の給料も下がる。外国人をもうこれ以上増やすべきでない。

    13K3.6K289132185K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.2x their median

    沖縄県知事選が戦われている。現在の玉城デニー知事は東京裁判史観にどっぷり漬かった人だ。中国などが素晴らしい国で、日本は侵略戦争を好む残虐な国家だと思っているように見える。だから日本国政府の安全保障政策には悉く反対だ。今回の選挙で是非とも落選してもらいたいと思う。

    11K1.8K1044399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20264.3x their median

    15世紀頃から始まった白人国家の世界植民地化計画は、最後に残った日本の徹底抗戦により頓挫した。日本は戦争には負けたが結果として当時世界の独立国は60数か国から現在の195か国に増えた。もし日本が戦わずにいたら白人国家の世界植民地化計画は完成していた可能性がある。一旦そうなってしまえば何百年それが続くか分からない。我が日本は世界史の中で人種平等の世界をつくるために大なる貢献をしたのだ。大東亜戦争は聖戦であった。

    6.7K1.4K477218565K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.5x their median

    在留外国人は近年、年間約10%のペースで増加しており、2025年末には初めて400万人を超えたという。大変な増え方だと思う。政府には外国人の流入を抑えるための強力な手を打ってもらいたい。外国人が増え過ぎては日本が日本で亡くなってしまう。

    5.9K1.2K1163059K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.0x their median

    国旗損壊罪法が成立した。嘗ての我が国ではそんな法律は不要だった。国民が国旗に誇りを持っていたから。しかし戦後教育で、日本の国は悪い国でその象徴である国旗も侵略の旗印であるというような馬鹿な教育を日教組がやってきた。そのために国旗や国歌を尊重することを法律で決めなければいけない国になってしまった。日教組を解散すべきだ。先生に組合活動は似合わない。

    5.1K9791173174K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20262.8x their median

    日中関係が悪化したままであるが、ニュース報道を見ていると日本だけが一方的に関係改善を望み、中国は日本が折れてこない限り関係悪化のままでも構わないという態度を取っているようだ。中国はすぐに日本への軍事侵攻など出来ないのだから、日本ももっと突き放した対応をすればよい。中国に完全に足元を見られている。日本よもっと強くなれ。

    4.7K62230234136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.4x their median

    我が国の朝鮮半島、満州、台湾における統治は、欧米白人国家の植民地統治に比べれば、現地の人たちの幸せも考えた極めて穏健なものであった。それにも拘わらず戦後教育で反日、反軍感情を植え付けられた日本人は日本の悪事ばかりに目が行く。よその国がやったから日本もやっていいということにはならないが、日本だけが悪く言われる筋合いもない。

    4.0K66522876330K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.3x their median

    あの戦争が終わって80年も過ぎたのにGHQの占領下で押し付けられたアメリカは絶対正義、日本は絶対悪というアメリカの歴史観が今なお大手を振って歩いている。その結果国の守りにタブーが多すぎて我が国の安全保障体制が欠陥だらけだ。憲法改正、専守防衛の廃止、攻撃力の強化、核武装を目指すなど、普通の国が考えていることを我が国は考えられない。日本政府に危機感がないからだ。

    3.8K8081254697K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20262.2x their median

    本日7月22日は私の78歳の誕生日です。心身共に元気です。昨日誕生日祝いに友人がゴルフに誘ってくれて37度の炎天下でラウンドしました。スコアは76(40、36)と久しぶりにエージシュート(年齢以下のスコア)を達成できました。レギュラーテー使用です。今日からまた発信を続けて参ります。友人たちは私が元気なのでどう見ても77歳にしか見えないと言ってくれます。しかし頑張ってもあと50~60年でしょうね。

    4.0K4021903360K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.461%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 4.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is 田母神俊雄's engagement rate on X?
田母神俊雄 (@toshio_tamogami) has an engagement rate of 0.461%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 446,416 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.461%, 田母神俊雄 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @toshio_tamogami have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @toshio_tamogami post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going