Back to @torontobigface's profile

多伦多方脸 engagement report

@torontobigface - 813K followers on X

Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.174%
of 813K followers
Per impression
0.887%
159K views on a typical post
Reach
19.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
79 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 813K followers, an engagement rate of 0.174%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 159K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

多伦多方脸's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.174%, 多伦多方脸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20264.3x their median

    把社会矛盾,转移到男女对立 真是中共又一伟大发明

    5.0K14489133751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.1x their median

    中国官员被抓之前 那通稿都是清正廉洁,毫无瑕疵,宛若圣人 一被抓之后,通稿那就是十恶不赦,罪大恶极 薛定谔的中国官员

    5.5K1231530274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.8x their median

    宣传翻车? 两岸团聚,一对姐妹,一个海峡,两种精气神 https://t.co/gRMs7qpeWk

    4.7K180522151.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.6x their median

    我现在一刷抖音那是反贼云集 一点开推特,时间线上全是粉红 属实难绷

    4.4K675739382K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.4x their median

    马斯克和他妈觉得中国好非常可以理解 中国实际上就是一个极度社达的社会 马斯克作为一个富豪,还是外国富豪,他们在中国的待遇仅次于中共高级老干部 他们又不用吃中国人996的苦,也不用担心中国的未来 但是跟着自豪的你呢?我的朋友? 廉价的中国人,正好是人家快乐的源泉呀

    4.2K15243914405K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.3x their median

    非常悲痛的是 香港终于变成了,大家不想看见的样子 华人的自由之地,又少了一块 https://t.co/MKgphVZpbl

    3.8K25761742435K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.0x their median

    对了,说起最近这个尼泊尔救灾 尼泊尔在去年10月份,刚刚通过Z世代抗议 推翻了前任独裁者,尼泊尔共产党 并选择了一个年轻的前rap歌手,作为总理

    3.8K1502695823K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.9x their median

    中共是不是有点太幼稚了 图1,我的评论区 图2,李老师的评论区 😅😅😅😅 https://t.co/TLA9U90wa8

    3.3K9563014455K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.8x their median

    香港第一个五年计划 这下彻底中国化了 https://t.co/wT6ncKcHib

    3.4K14640228553K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.8x their median

    所以不是很理解现在的中共的想法 男女对立,青年压力,导致的生育率爆炸 这件事情中共上心程度不到机器人翻跟头十分之一 习近平对这件事才是真的松弛,到今天也没有出台任何强有力的刺激生育政策 习近平是觉得自己反正也活不到那天,后人自己去解决吗?

    3.1K7378320705K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 813K followers, an engagement rate of 0.174%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 159K times each, and 0.887% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 4.3x its own typical post.

What is 多伦多方脸's engagement rate on X?
多伦多方脸 (@torontobigface) has an engagement rate of 0.174%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 812,923 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.174%, 多伦多方脸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @torontobigface have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @torontobigface post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going