Back to @tora_slave's profile

虎丸 🐯 engagement report

@tora_slave - 972K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.375%
of 972K followers
Per impression
0.879%
415K views on a typical post
Reach
42.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.294%
1.2K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 972K followers, an engagement rate of 0.375%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 415K times each, and 0.879% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 63% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

虎丸 🐯's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.375%, 虎丸 🐯 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 202417x their median

    奥まで挿れて掻き回すと支配してる感じするよ https://t.co/gPQOH7tCLh

    146K17K20243322M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202614x their median

    ハメ潮も喉ボコもイラマ潮も全部凄すぎて言葉が出てきません、、🤦‍♀️🫶 https://t.co/UJftkz5fl6

    46K3.7K26324.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.2x their median

    腰掴んでしっかり中に出しちゃうやつ🫶 https://t.co/bKuT3RGYOx

    14K1.2K616415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.3x their median

    おっぱい揉みくちゃ中出しロールスロイス🫶🐯 https://t.co/4AxKJGE5bS

    7.8K635471.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.9x their median

    おっぱいギチギチに掴まれて膣キュンしちゃう女の子もスッキ🫶🐯 https://t.co/ywA3RFotwx

    6.3K50568606K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20261.5x their median

    『美巨乳女子ちゃん✖︎制服コス✖︎生ハメ中出しSEX』👯🫶 https://t.co/237fchnu84

    5.1K41062566K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    やっぱJKコスってえっち🫶 https://t.co/VJDEUlUdkL

    4.0K31331587K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    デカ尻の突き出しバック最高、、🫶🫶 https://t.co/W2hNkkfryz

    3.7K24831166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    後ろから腕とか首掴まれて膣キュンしちゃう女の子がスッキ🫶🐯 https://t.co/TBpqC8gf3G

    3.4K27252823K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026

    イラマ好き巨乳女子ちゃんとハメハメ🍑👯 https://t.co/fj47uPhiUu

    3.3K25553264K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 972K followers, an engagement rate of 0.375%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 415K times each, and 0.879% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 63% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 163K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is 虎丸 🐯's engagement rate on X?
虎丸 🐯 (@tora_slave) has an engagement rate of 0.375%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 972,276 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.375%, 虎丸 🐯 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tora_slave have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tora_slave post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going