“Sudden And Unexpected” engagement report
@toobaffled - 405K followers on X
Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.151%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
“Sudden And Unexpected”'s engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.151%, “Sudden And Unexpected” sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 27% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 488 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 202618x their median
A nurse with 23 years on the ward answers: if you birthed in a hospital and slept at any point, they were injected. 💉 Vitamin K. Hepatitis B. She says the line they use is, we are just taking the baby to weigh it on a more precise scale. That is not informed consent. That is a baby leaving the room and coming back with two shots the parents never agreed to.
- Sep 9, 202616x their median
Same script as the kids. Annual boosters. “Just in case.” No discussion of how many the animal actually needs. Cats get injection-site sarcomas .. aggressive tumours that grow where the needle went in. Vets have known about that for decades. Allergic shock after a shot is not rare. Dogs pick up autoimmune flares, skin wreckage and mystery illness after a “routine” visit and it gets written off as coincidence. Then they wonder why the waiting room is full of cancer, allergies and animals that never bounce back. Rabies where the law demands it is one conversation. A lifetime of extra boosters because the reminder card showed up is another. Read the insert. Ask how often that shot is even required. Stop treating the pet like a second customer for the same product line.
- Aug 27, 202615x their median
New York’s Amish community is issuing an ultimatum to state bureaucrats: leave us alone or we’re packing up our buggies for greener pastures. The threat has been sparked by a vaccine mandate fight that the 25,000 strong religious community is taking all the way to the Supreme Court. It takes place as state Health Department officials continue to slap thousands in fines on tiny, one-room parochial Amish schools which have refused to comply with a Cuomo-era vaccine decree. https://t.co/5dqdmhEHRM
- Aug 30, 202613x their median
I think she answered her own issue. 👀 💉 💉 💉 👀 https://t.co/OVcm7cb86k
- Aug 30, 20268.6x their median
““You don’t vaccinate..?” No. But I did. At one point, I was pushed and bullied by my child’s doctor to vaccinate my first baby. I was made to feel like I was doing something wrong by going against my gut. I vaccinated until 15 months old & that was the last time. She received the MMR vaccine. I was told a mild fever would be the side effect and to treat with Tylenol. 4 hours later, my bright eyed, perfect baby was never the same. I woke up to a pool of her sweat & her seizing then went unresponsive. I rushed her to the ER. She was awake, scared and crying a cry I’ve never heard before. The ER asked if she had any vaccines. When I told them about the MMR, the doctor told me never to vaccinate her again. She had a reaction. My perfect baby within the next few months showed signs of difficulty. Noise making, toe walking, flapping hands, squeaking, sensitive to noises, getting over stimulated. Signs we all know of what that points too. So I knew, as a mother, that I went against my gut and it hurt my baby. My baby, is a vaccine injured baby and it’s my fault. I have had 4 other babies after her. All of them unvaccinated. No toe walking, hand flapping, sensitivities, noise making. “Normal kids.” I took that, unknowingly from my first born. & I was always hesitant to speak out and share what happened to her because I have been called a liar. You don’t have to believe me. But I know I am not alone in this. Please listen to your gut. Don’t let them bully you. Your kid is the one who pays the price.” - Alexandria Roy - https://t.co/VrQmw01Qzx ❤️🩹
- Sep 23, 20267.3x their median
I thought this was just another conspiracy? 🤷🏼♀️ ⚠️ They could be "the new asbestos" for people exposed hours on end in homes, schools, offices or hospitals, leading scientists have warned 💡 Neuroscientist Professor Glen Jeffery described LED technology as a “clear and present public health emergency” comparable to the toxic building material asbestos which was widely used before its health risks were understood. Prof Jeffery and his University College London (UCL) colleague Dr Bob Fosbury fear prolonged exposure to LEDs may disrupt with the way cells generate energy. https://t.co/jdpnzRv9mS
- Sep 7, 20267.1x their median
This is Chris Ashenden. A lot of people know him from property, from the Keith Cunningham rooms in the early 2000s, and from AG1 … the supplement company Joe Rogan helped put on the map. He built that into a huge American business and lived in the States for years. Nine months ago he lost the ability to stand or walk. He has been in a wheelchair since December. He is saying it himself. “Five years ago I had two Pfizer COVID shots. After the second, my heart rate went above 100 and stayed there for weeks. Then came the fatigue. I pushed through. I was miserable. I kept grinding along, kept trying to work. Thought I could outwill it. Massive mistake. By early 2024 I could no longer work, so I stepped down from running AG1. Through 2025 the dizziness episodes kept getting worse. Then one day the rocking and the pressure came on harder than ever. And never left. The doctors who finally pieced it together found that my body is still producing large amounts of COVID spike protein, five years on, with no virus in me. That, combined with major mold exposure, pushed my system into runaway inflammation: microclots, damaged blood vessels, my immune system attacking my own body.” He thought he was going to die in January. He is still fighting. He is still expecting a better chapter. That is his account. In his words. Listen to him with Liz Gunn here: https://t.co/9uxq5JPSZc
- Aug 28, 20267.0x their median
https://t.co/9eMyCCRHcj
- Aug 27, 20265.9x their median
https://t.co/WsHkpYnQIK
- Sep 7, 20265.7x their median
They will put a doctor on every night to say the injuries are rare. They will not put the injured on to say what rare actually looks like. If the stories were nothing, they would let them talk. They do not let them talk. 🤫 Think about it. https://t.co/cxygBSkLw0
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.151%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.
- What is “Sudden And Unexpected”'s engagement rate on X?
- “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) has an engagement rate of 0.151%, based on the median interactions across 118 original posts from the last 30 days against 405,241 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.151%, “Sudden And Unexpected” sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @toobaffled have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @toobaffled post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.37 posts per day across the measured window.