Back to @tomgunner14's profile

ỌmọTọmiwa engagement report

@tomgunner14 - 59K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.019%
of 59K followers
Per impression
0.607%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 102 interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ỌmọTọmiwa's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, ỌmọTọmiwa sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 20269.3x their median

    Martin Keown: Arsenal have had two tough away games. In terms of grinding away a result, great. Their defence is immense. The beauty of this squad is that they have two players for every position. https://t.co/PULomZSxXV

    1002002.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.5x their median

    Guimaraes: "It was unbelievable, I feel very good. Everyone knows I had a difficult start through injuries in my short time. But I'm glad to be back and glad to play. And yeah, I score a beautiful goal, beautiful moment for me and my family and I am happy." https://t.co/kd5OR7JNNJ

    372001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.9x their median

    Joe Cole: Everything runs through Martin Odegaard. He can stand still and find space. He is at the peak of his powers and it is beautiful to watch. You can't help but love watching him play his football. https://t.co/GnNxmkayRa

    302001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.8x their median

    Arsenal's perfect start to the season goes on after passing an almighty test at the Stadium of Light. https://t.co/8omryBTXqT

    283001.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.4x their median

    A Raya penalty save, a Guimaraes stunner, and this game has been turned on its head in the space of two minutes. David Raya ran over to the sideline and was mobbed by Mikel Arteta and his coaching staff. Without his penalty save, that goal might never happen. https://t.co/KalMStKWuo

    260001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.3x their median

    Arsenal won the title on merit last season, and whatever happens next with Manchester City, that doesn’t change. In fact, we are probably glad we got one over on Pep Guardiola before this all came out. https://t.co/7Fq7EAcQ77

    205001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.9x their median

    Guimares: Raya 'definitely' best keeper in world. Karen Carney: The whole midfield changed when Bruno came on. Martin Keown: Bruno 'shut the crowd up with that effort' https://t.co/YreNNpacSV

    201001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.8x their median

    FT: Sunderland 0-2 Arsenal - Raya saves Le Fee's penalty - Guimaraes scores screamer - Saka score the penalty Back on Top of the league Next league match: Brighton (a) ; Sept 19. https://t.co/fx973Jgen1

    191001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.8x their median

    Five games Five wins Four clean sheets https://t.co/ufwL8mduR0

    200001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.6x their median

    Ipswich manager Gary O'Neil: 'Arsenal are tough to beat, even if you do everything right.' https://t.co/NfJDQS9G3z

    180001.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 102 interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

What is ỌmọTọmiwa's engagement rate on X?
ỌmọTọmiwa (@tomgunner14) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 58,662 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, ỌmọTọmiwa sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tomgunner14 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tomgunner14 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going