Back to @tntsports's profile

TNT Sports engagement report

@tntsports - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 310 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.672%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
2.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
182
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
10.4/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 310 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.672% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 310 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 98x its own typical post.

Measured over 310 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #lavercup.

Compared with accounts its own size

TNT Sports's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, TNT Sports sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 202698x their median

    This is heartbreaking to watch πŸ₯ΊπŸ’” Mark Allen admits he may never play snooker again. We’re all rooting for you, Mark πŸ™β€οΈ https://t.co/9v6wvWMflE

    16K7264814993.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202626x their median

    Andy Roddick thinks Iga Swiatek deserves a little more respect πŸ‘ https://t.co/TSoinh8faA

    4.2K4109377249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202622x their median

    The Jannik Sinner Foundation has signed a two-year agreement with UNICEF to provide education for almost 100,000 children affected by emergencies across the world ❀️ https://t.co/nMlgjZzhTM

    3.4K4454377112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202621x their median

    Keely Hodgkinson ends her 2026 season in style by winning the Athlos 800m in a hooded speed suit πŸ’« https://t.co/WfdcxqiQQk

    3.6K1399040824K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202621x their median

    Qinwen Zheng has donated Β£110,000 to the mudslide disaster area in Jilong, Tibet. True class both on and off the court πŸ‘ https://t.co/54h7VEJAJu

    3.5K2853432106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202618x their median

    For the first time since 1998, all six top seeds have reached the women's singles quarter-finals of the US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (via @OptaAce) https://t.co/2Gs4gB9w76

    2.8K379336184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202615x their median

    Carlos Alcaraz never goes out of style in NYC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ”₯ https://t.co/P8YqREpBVU

    2.5K156142574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202615x their median

    A one-handed backhand has reached a Grand Slam semi-final every year since 1877. Tsitsipas is the last one left πŸ‘€ https://t.co/aY6BAS3x1U

    2.5K1512024118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202614x their median

    "I'm third best in the world, I suck..." Never change, Andre Agassi πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/76QX4S53Nl

    2.3K1775176634K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202614x their median

    β€œThat was easily the hardest match I’ve ever had to deal with” πŸ’” An emotional victory for Jordan Brown, as close friend Mark Allen opens up about the possibility of retirement following their match. https://t.co/SMmnCuBNve

    2.4K964716508K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lavercup

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 310 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.672% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 310 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 98x its own typical post.

What is TNT Sports's engagement rate on X?
TNT Sports (@tntsports) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 310 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,213,032 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, TNT Sports sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tntsports have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tntsports post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going