Back to @thmeythmey's profile

Thmey Thmey engagement report

@thmeythmey - 73K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 73K followers
Per impression
0.488%
205 views on a typical post
Reach
0.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 205 times each, and 0.488% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Thmey Thmey's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Thmey Thmey sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202612x their median

    αžαžΎβ€‹αž–αžΆαž€αŸ’αž™ Β«β€‹αž“αž·αž„β€‹Β» , Β«β€‹αž“αžΉαž„β€‹Β» αž“αž·αž„ Β«β€‹αž αŸ’αž“αžΉαž„β€‹Β» αž˜αžΆαž“β€‹αž’αžαŸ’αžαž“αŸαž™ αž“αž·αž„β€‹αž”αŸ’αžšαžΎβ€‹αžαž»αžŸαž‚αŸ’αž“αžΆβ€‹αžŠαžΌαž…αž˜αŸ’αžαŸαž…β€‹? αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/Ydn6T1jJKn https://t.co/QVf5tbYMVV

    12000267 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202610x their median

    αž˜αž“αŸ’αžšαŸ’αžαžΈ αž”αž„αŸ’αž€αŸ’αžšαžΆαž”αž”αž‘αž›αŸ’αž˜αžΎαžŸαž’αž“αž’αžΆαž“αž’αž˜αŸ’αž˜αž‡αžΆαžαž·αž”αžΆαž“αŸ’αŸ¦αž€αžšαžŽαžΈ αž“αŸ…αž§αž‘αŸ’αž™αžΆαž“αž‡αžΆαžαž·αž–αŸ’αžšαŸ‡αžŸαž»αžšαžΆαž˜αŸ’αžšαž·αž-αž€αž»αžŸαž»αž˜αŸˆΒ«αž‚αž·αžšαžΈαžšαž˜αŸ’αž™Β» αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ–β€‹https://t.co/y4aQ6IiplQ https://t.co/xEcBYNCzIY

    10000605 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20266.0x their median

    αž”αžΆαžαž»αž—αžΌαž Β«αž’αŸ‚αž›αž“αžΈαž‰αŸ‰αžΌΒ» αž’αŸ’αžœαžΎαž±αŸ’αž™αž€αžŸαž·αž€αžšαžšαžΆαžšαŸ‚αž€αž…αž·αžαŸ’αžαž€αŸ’αž“αž»αž„αž€αžΆαžšαžŠαžΆαŸ†αž–αŸ„αžαž€αŸ’αžšαž αž˜αž“αŸ…αžšαžŠαžΌαžœαž€αŸ’αžšαŸ„αž™ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/mW610VrlQv https://t.co/3atyuQ7WRl

    6000393 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.0x their median

    MG CambodiaαŸ– αžŸαž˜αžšαž˜αŸ’αž™αž‘αžΆαŸ†αž„αžαž˜αŸ’αž›αŸƒαžšαžαž™αž“αŸ’αžαž–αŸαž›αž‘αž·αž‰ αž“αž·αž„αžŸαž“αŸ’αžŸαŸ†αžŸαŸ†αž…αŸƒαž”αžΆαž“αž…αŸ’αžšαžΎαž“αž›αžΎαž€αžΆαžšαž…αŸ†αžŽαžΆαž™αžαŸ’αž›αŸƒαžŸαžΆαŸ†αž„ αž“αž·αž„αž”αŸ’αžαžΌαžšαž”αŸ’αžšαŸαž„αž˜αŸ‰αžΆαžŸαŸŠαžΈαž“αž₯αžαž‚αž·αžαžαŸ’αž›αŸƒαžšαž™αŸˆαž–αŸαž›αžœαŸ‚αž„ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/LJ7jMsQSmb https://t.co/zUAOkz0156

    5000305 viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.0x their median

    αžŸαž˜αžŽαž“αž·αžŸαŸ’αžŸαž·αž αž‡αžΆ ស៊ីម αžŸαž„αŸ‹αžšαžΌαž”αžŸαŸ†αžŽαžΆαž€αž’αŸ’αž“αž€β€‹αž”αž„αŸ’αž€αžΎαžβ€‹αž–αž»αž˜αŸ’αž–β€‹αž’αž€αŸ’αžŸαžšβ€‹αžαŸ’αž˜αŸ‚αžšβ€‹ αžŸαžΆαžŸαŸ’αžαŸ’αžšαžΆαž…αžΆαžšαŸ’αž™ αž€αŸαž„ αžœαŸ‰αžΆαž“αŸ‹αžŸαžΆαž€αŸ‹ αž”αž„αŸ’αž αžΆαž‰αžŠαž›αŸ‹αž’αŸ’αž“αž€αž‡αŸ†αž“αžΆαž“αŸ‹αž€αŸ’αžšαŸ„αž™ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/NMDYXkeKPz https://t.co/XiE1FOvT0Y

    4000137 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    αž’αžαžΈαžαž“αžΆαž™αž€αžšαžŠαŸ’αž‹αž˜αž“αŸ’αžαŸ’αžšαžΈαž€αžΆαžŽαžΆαžŠαžΆ αž…αžΆαžŸαŸ’αž‘αžΈαž“ αž‘αŸ’αžšαžΌαžŠαžΌ αž”αžΎαž€αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž˜αž αŸŠαž»αž“αž•αž›αž·αžαžαŸ’αžŸαŸ‚αž—αžΆαž–αž™αž“αŸ’αž αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/Q74CvPY1r8 https://t.co/9MiSeWg25D

    3000304 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    αž’αŸ’αž“αž€αž›αŸ’αž˜αžΎαžŸαž…αŸ’αž”αžΆαž”αž…αžšαžΆαž…αžšαžŽαŸαž“αŸ…αž€αŸ’αžšαž»αž„αžŸαŸ€αž˜αžšαžΆαž” αž“αžΉαž„αžαŸ’αžšαžΌαžœβ€‹αž–αž·αž“αŸαž™αž±αŸ’αž™αžšαŸ€αž“β€‹αž…αŸ’αž”αžΆαž”αŸ‹αž…αžšαžΆαž…αžšαžŽαŸ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/5Yqu5Unrkp https://t.co/Vim9lsVj59

    2100385 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    αžŸαŸ’αžαžΌαž”αž’αž“αž»αžŸαŸ’αžŸαžΆαžœαžšαžΈαž™αŸαž…αž›αž“αžΆαž”αŸ’αžšαž†αžΆαŸ†αž„αž”αŸ‰αž»αž› αž–αž αž“αŸ…αžαŸ†αž”αž“αŸ‹αž–αŸ’αžšαŸƒαžαžΆαž‘αž€ αž“αžΉαž„αžαŸ’αžšαžΌαžœαž›αŸαž…αžšαžΌαž”αžšαžΆαž„ αžŠαžΎαž˜αŸ’αž”αžΈαžšαŸ†αž­αž€αžŠαž›αŸ‹αž€αžΆαžšαžαžŸαŸŠαžΌ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/BqNFS4rzXG https://t.co/l6w9DcawvV

    3000433 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    αž›αŸ„αž€ αž˜αŸ‰αžΌαžŒαžΈ αž‚αžΌαžŸαž”αž‰αŸ’αž‡αžΆαž€αŸ‹αž–αžΈαž—αžΆαž–αž…αžΆαŸ†αž”αžΆαž…αŸ‹αž“αŸƒαžŸαŸαžšαžΈαž—αžΆαž–αž“αžΆαžœαžΆαž…αžšαžŽαŸ αž‘αŸ…αž”αŸ’αžšαž’αžΆαž“αžΆαž’αž·αž”αžαžΈαž’αŸŠαžΈαžšαŸ‰αž„αŸ‹ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/oYBddNZyCU https://t.co/p2eE26mkUD

    3000239 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    αžŸαž˜αžαŸ’αžαž€αž·αž…αŸ’αž…αžƒαžΆαžαŸ‹αžαŸ’αž›αž½αž“αž‡αž“αžŸαž„αŸ’αžŸαŸαž™αž˜αŸ’αž“αžΆαž€αŸ‹ αž”αŸ’αžšαžΎαžˆαŸ’αž˜αŸ„αŸ‡αž’αžΆαž‡αŸ’αž‰αžΆαž’αžšαž™αž€αž‘αŸ…αž†αž”αŸ„αž€αž˜αž αžΆαž‡αž“ αž’αžΆαž“αž›αž˜αŸ’αž’αž·αžαŸ– https://t.co/4AAI8pI2aJ https://t.co/7T9Qa7KovV

    30002.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 205 times each, and 0.488% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Thmey Thmey's engagement rate on X?
Thmey Thmey (@thmeythmey) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 73,302 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Thmey Thmey sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thmeythmey have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thmeythmey post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going