Back to @thing_gog's profile

gog engagement report

@thing_gog - 287K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.43%
of 287K followers
Per impression
1.49%
83K views on a typical post
Reach
29.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.196%
163 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 287K followers, an engagement rate of 0.43%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 83K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

gog's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.43%, gog sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 57 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 26, 202632x their median

    카리나가 게임캐릭터 같을 때.. 진짜같음 https://t.co/XNw22Idt4r

    34K5.6K233301.6M viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 202622x their median

    요즘 제가 이러한 무드에 빠졌는데요. https://t.co/8JWfNGIlYK

    25K1.9K143301.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202619x their median

    울산여고 한소희를 기억해주세요•• https://t.co/rnmx6gmfBu

    21K1.8K13391.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20269.0x their median

    서울 {빙수맛집} 총정리 zip. 출처 : @ must.know.trend https://t.co/VBCEa4VKfE

    6.9K3.1K41.1K818K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.8x their median

    동물원에서 고릴라 2마리 탈출함 https://t.co/e3SSmhcHvm

    8.1K2.1K37134.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20268.1x their median

    제가 원하는 가을 슬래커 룩 .. https://t.co/F1UGZHdLsW

    8.9K8170258537K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.6x their median

    아 연애하고 싶다. 커플링 맞춰서 약지에 나누어끼고 맛있는 디저트 뿌수러 카페에 다니고 아플땐 간호해주고 잘 잤냐고 아침에 카톡하고 자기 전에는 오늘 하루 어땠는지 전화하고 서로 밥은 먹었냐 확인하고 은은한 이끌림으로 시작해서 후져하는 게 비슷한 느낌으로 서로가 편안한 관계가 되고싶다

    4.4K7621450220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.5x their median

    뭔가 선택이 어려울 때 이 방법 써보셈 <좋아하는 사람을 모방하면 대체로 그 선택은 괜찮음>

    4.4K8370299129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.8x their median

    신예은 어릴때 https://t.co/p6CDvceIBM

    4.3K31904369K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.5x their median

    가을 출근룩 추구미 총집합체 https://t.co/Zaoj3mZ4Cg

    3.9K392181184K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 287K followers, an engagement rate of 0.43%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 83K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is gog's engagement rate on X?
gog (@thing_gog) has an engagement rate of 0.43%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 286,860 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.43%, gog sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thing_gog have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thing_gog post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going