Back to @thewinningdiff1's profile

The Winning Difference engagement report

@thewinningdiff1 - 102K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 102K followers
Per impression
1.36%
6.4K views on a typical post
Reach
6.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
86
interactions (median)
Saved
0.416%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 874 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Winning Difference's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, The Winning Difference sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 236 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 10, 202610x their median

    “It doesn’t matter what everybody says, what everybody else thinks. It only matters in what we believe and what we do,” @CoachVenables The process doesn’t care about your ranking or reputation. It only responds to your standards and consistent commitment to growth. https://t.co/gJxm9YAf8m

    770961730K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20267.4x their median

    "You don’t get rewarded for doing what is required."@inkyjohnson Greatness is not given to a chosen few. Greatness is given to the few who choose to do 'more than what's required'. To be great, you have to give great -great sacrifice, great focus, great discipline, great effort. https://t.co/DuJVVQo2Je

    47015211364K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20264.9x their median

    Adversity will always test the space between teammates. Connection is easy when everyone is winning. The real test comes when frustration, pressure, and adversity show up. Great teams don’t splinter. They tighten the circle. https://t.co/8Kc2PMPfPR

    354630629K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20264.9x their median

    If losing doesn’t bother you, winning probably doesn’t mean enough to you. The best competitors take responsibility because they care deeply about the result, the team, and the standard. Caring deeply comes with a cost but so does becoming great. https://t.co/Pq9PES9pg6

    338723529K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.8x their median

    “Any great player wants to be coached hard. Coaches take players to levels they can’t take themselves. What great player doesn’t want to be coached hard?” Being coachable means caring more about getting better than being right. https://t.co/CSuF6gSzhD

    320831621K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20264.0x their median

    Adversity doesn’t beat teams. Bad responses do. You don’t need to play a perfect game. You need a response. Competition will expose you at some point. What separates great teams is how quickly they recover, reconnect, and keep attacking. https://t.co/kH0QAIrfzy

    263720520K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.8x their median

    Champions have an exceptional will. But they’re also exceptionally willing. More willing to do the extra work. More willing to make sacrifices More willing to accept hard coaching. More willing to hold themselves to the standard when nobody is watching. Everybody wants the result. Champions accept the responsibility. Your will means little until your willingness proves it.

    250751514K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.5x their median

    There’s nothing wrong with hard. What’s wrong is expecting to get better while avoiding everything that challenges you. You have to choose the work before you earn the result. https://t.co/eOvpAtEy11

    229680415K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.4x their median

    "You don’t get rewarded for doing what is required."@inkyjohnson Greatness is not given to a chosen few. Greatness is given to the few who choose to do 'more than what's required'. To be great, you have to give great -great sacrifice, great focus, great discipline, great effort. https://t.co/LuloD6WLjn

    218670613K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.1x their median

    We coach to make others believe. Not in us, but in themselves. https://t.co/VON8xzjeiZ

    226381410K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 1.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 874 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is The Winning Difference's engagement rate on X?
The Winning Difference (@thewinningdiff1) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,266 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, The Winning Difference sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thewinningdiff1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thewinningdiff1 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going