Back to @thesiriusreport's profile

The Sirius Report engagement report

@thesiriusreport - 236K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 236K followers
Per impression
1.83%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
166
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 985 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Sirius Report's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, The Sirius Report sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link35% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 20265.9x their median

    Saudi is about to increase its trading of oil with China in Yuan. More importantly it will be in an official capacity.

    85111811519K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.3x their median

    It still seems poorly understood that the US went to war with Iran because they couldn't destroy them economically, after trying for 47 years. So now it looks like Trump is seeking to declare the war is over and the US is back to maximum economic sanctions once again. The paper tiger has exposed itself, once again.

    74012620119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.8x their median

    Washington finally got the message that China has 40k tons of gold. Although it is now 52k tons. I told them back in 2015 that this was the case. It often takes years for reality to permeate the grey matter of the Beltway.

    7067618435K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.7x their median

    Repeat after me: The AfD win in Germany wasn’t a vote FOR anything. It was a vote AGAINST something else It really is that simple, so please stop all the hand-wringing

    611559820106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.3x their median

    Westerners still don't understand that China is a nation of prolific savers. They don't feel the need to consume unnecessarily. Meanwhile in the West we are consumption junkies buying garbage to impress the friends we don't have.

    59310112225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.3x their median

    Bessent sees oil down to $40 post Iran war. Someone ought to remind him that at those prices US Shale Oil is doomed. It is hilarious listening to US politicians who sound so convincing despite having so little understanding.

    6007925315K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.2x their median

    It is getting painful like a karate kick to the gonads that people still don't grasp that any war between Europe and Russia is over in 5 mins with Europe incinerated. Everyone in the Western hierarchy knows this and hence why it will never happen. It is also why listening to Western officials contradicting this assertion is meaningless.

    4386419215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20233.1x their median

    We have discussed the use of barter in trade for years. Note rather like China has done with Iraq, Beijing will build an airport in Iran and in return Tehran will give China oil No need for USD. Barter in trade is more commonplace than conventional wisdom believes.

    4118412741K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.1x their median

    Precious Metals Update: I am pleased to announce that I have joined a Precious Metals company located in Hong Kong. We will be selling gold and silver which will be vaulted in Hong Kong. We will be offering highly competitive prices for both gold and silver as well as vaulting fees. In addition we will provide the capability to sell your gold and silver vaulted with us. We also have our own in-house legal and compliance team. More details to follow shortly.

    4433132230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.8x their median

    Apparently it is a marriage of convenience between China and Russia and really they hate each other. Clown show in the West is embarrassing: Russia and China joint investment portfolio now involves 66 major projects and 28 prospective projects. There are likely to be many others that are not being disclosed.

    3974812318K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 166 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 985 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

What is The Sirius Report's engagement rate on X?
The Sirius Report (@thesiriusreport) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,868 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, The Sirius Report sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thesiriusreport have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thesiriusreport post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going