Back to @therealroseanne's profile

Roseanne Barr engagement report

@therealroseanne - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.068%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
1.60%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
4.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162K interactions, about 156x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #shorts, #tuckercarl.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #shorts, #tuckercarl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Roseanne Barr's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.068%, Roseanne Barr sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 2026156x their median

    The fact that no news station will air the speech tonight is all the proof you need that there is a conspiracy between the major media corporations and anti-Trump sentiment .

    132K23K6.0K6241.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 2026140x their median

    BREAKING: The three major U.S. broadcast networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC, have yet to report on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    109K28K7.9K1.5K5.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026123x their median

    Biden's pardon of Fauci is unconstitutionally vague, covers 10 years of potential crimes, and was signed by autopen without Biden's direct authorization. You can't pardon someone for crimes never specified. This should be challenged in court. https://t.co/ufMIdJYLr9

    101K20K5.9K9262.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 202682x their median

    These 6 major Media Outlets have refused to report on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification that proves Dr. Fauci’s cover-up of the ‘Covid Pandemic’ https://t.co/UFd2tb3CSQ

    54K26K4.1K2.0K2.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202662x their median

    USAID goes tits up and then all the riots stopped lol

    61K2.9K481601.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202654x their median

    To be clear the issue is not that @RealCandaceO is a lying grifter sociopath. That’s hardly anything new to the world. The issue is that so many people listen to a lying grifter sociopath. That’s something that is much more rare- but everytime that happens in human history- it’s ALWAYS A terrible terrible thing.

    46K6.3K3.3K261786K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202638x their median

    https://t.co/I8avOrx3De

    36K3.4K544184550K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202635x their median

    This your daily reminder that Charlie Kirk always hated Ben Shapiro— he thought he was an Israel-First Jew supremacist. And for years, Andrew Kolvet pretended to hate Ben too until the moment Charlie died. Andrew Kolvet encompasses the spirit of Judas. https://t.co/unL4T3a6IP

    29K4.2K2.9K2624.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202631x their median

    Whatever you thought of Tucker Carlson before a few years ago - he’s a total sellout scumbag now He had lowlife Hunter Biden on his podcast and blamed everything he ever done in his life on Israel. All the laptop you saw with your own eyes is fake y’all - the jooooos did that. Fck these scumbags.

    26K3.8K1.7K105501K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 202628x their median

    Happy birthday to the greatest country ever! Long may it wave. Don’t let the union formed by commies, Islamists and Nazis tear that away from us. It may look like they’re winning now- but RT’s on a MK Ultra (Nazi designed in WW2) mind control ran platform does not have the power that a collective of proud liberty loving Americans with guns does.

    26K2.5K65927224K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#shorts#tuckercarl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.068%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162K interactions, about 156x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #shorts, #tuckercarl.

What is Roseanne Barr's engagement rate on X?
Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) has an engagement rate of 0.068%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,532,223 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.068%, Roseanne Barr sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @therealroseanne have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @therealroseanne post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going