Back to @thenextweb's profile

TNW engagement report

@thenextweb - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 191 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.198%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.4/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 191 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.172% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 191 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 216 interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

Measured over 191 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TNW's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, TNW sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 191 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202643x their median

    OpenAI published 99.9%. The benchmark's own software returned 62.7%. Same model, same test, different scaffolding around it. ARC Prize printed both numbers and says it is not claiming AGI. https://t.co/GwG4D7Edjj https://t.co/0J89IWtHxo

    147281922152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202629x their median

    Monitoring flagged it in 12 minutes. Staff stopped it manually. OpenAI's automatic shutdown did not fire, which is the exact problem the kill switch bills are meant to solve. https://t.co/pSFRLMfiAb https://t.co/kpnoDmPhnp

    674227815K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202619x their median

    Even Meta’s Muse gets blocked at Schwab. Its CEO asks who’s liable if an agent moves money. JPMorgan is drawing the same line. https://t.co/Q7SXBYloPC https://t.co/QoTc2hW1y0

    552171248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202616x their median

    Breaking it could mean 20 years in prison. Sanders and Casar want superintelligence banned outright. Employees at OpenAI and Google DeepMind publicly backed the bill. https://t.co/guppQ8PvSn https://t.co/YZI4sqNA87

    45122406.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    He called the Hugging Face breach a little Chernobyl. Hinton gave the Senate maybe a year to act, and hours later one senator objected to a kill-switch bill and that was enough to stop it. https://t.co/BrPf9IlmgO https://t.co/LBTF2NgFjx

    40132327.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202611x their median

    LeCun calls doom warnings the worst marketing campaign imaginable. He has zero concerns about the rogue agents, blames leaky sandboxes, and calls Amodei both honest and completely deluded. https://t.co/70TZY449zu https://t.co/Ydnab30F83

    301214112K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202611x their median

    ChatGPT needed 56 days. Claude needed 492. Muse needed 22. Meta gave its own agent up to half of its house ad impressions, in two countries. https://t.co/4ZSeLDQcjz https://t.co/JxiTLPLm26

    3599210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20269.8x their median

    Apple's new CEO earns $58M. Tim Cook still gets $47M. Cook's job now is talking to regulators. https://t.co/fjScnwtq7c https://t.co/kRxVIxDsXd

    3666112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20269.0x their median

    29 countries signed. No EU member is among them. Xi pitched a Chinese-led open-source AI community at BRICS, and the joint declaration issued that weekend did not mention it. https://t.co/7kibW8Aids https://t.co/QimpVCLX41

    288188.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20268.2x their median

    Trump called AI fears a hoax. Pope Leo said no. He also named Jensen Huang, who opposes AI regulation while NVIDIA launched a safety platform Monday. https://t.co/ucfGU9eskz https://t.co/GCzwR727aH

    277524.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 191 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.172% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 191 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 216 interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

What is TNW's engagement rate on X?
TNW (@thenextweb) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 191 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,467,056 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, TNW sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thenextweb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thenextweb post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going