Back to @thechicks's profile

The Chicks engagement report

@thechicks - 560K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 560K followers
Per impression
1.51%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
1.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
156
interactions (median)
Saved
0.131%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 560K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The Chicks's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, The Chicks sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link39% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 39% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 2024243x their median

    Let's get this done America #HarrisWalz2024 https://t.co/cX9rrzGmdp

    56K4.1K1.4K197860K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2024179x their median

    See you soon #DNC2024 Use your voice. Use your vote. Photo by James White https://t.co/pas14Wd3bf

    39K3.2K2.9K5201.4M viewsView on X
  • Dec 23, 202312x their median

    1/2 Laura was a bright light…her infectious energy and humor gave a spark to the early days of our band. Laura had a gift for design, a love of all things Texas and was instrumental in the early success of the band. https://t.co/Q2WsqF5miM

    2.5K3629853324K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202411x their median

    25 years will really FLY by! 😘🪰 https://t.co/nYKznqGC1t https://t.co/0xPMI2UyXj

    2.5K145443961K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 202613x their median

    Taking The Long Way was released 20 years ago today. Still not ready to make nice. Listen: https://t.co/y5bmk5XXPG https://t.co/7NOOLrlaUB

    1.7K274563948K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 202611x their median

    Taking The Long Way 20th Anniversary Tour announced! Join us and sign up for the presale here: https://t.co/VAWdBei6dN Still not ready to make nice. https://t.co/a9szDNX3Ok

    1.3K3127653153K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20256.8x their median

    An incredible night at @aclfestival with the one and only @SabrinaAnnLynn. Thank you for having us! 💕💕💕 https://t.co/X8oedMBWo6

    1.6K13620537K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20266.6x their median

    Released six years ago today! https://t.co/dDvYEIqnuR https://t.co/s9dYTeKN8y

    94260181118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20266.3x their median

    This will be a tour like no other we've ever done! Playing the full album, lots of memories and no opener so show up on time! xo https://t.co/LgMTR7zcFf

    85061591451K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20265.8x their median

    Stay tuned... Still not ready to make nice. https://t.co/XRjB1DAu63

    80963231426K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 156 interactions against 560K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 243x its own typical post.

What is The Chicks's engagement rate on X?
The Chicks (@thechicks) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 559,988 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, The Chicks sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @thechicks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @thechicks post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going