Back to @the_jefferymead's profile

Jeffery Mead engagement report

@the_jefferymead - 628K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.933%
of 628K followers
Per impression
13.1%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
7.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.314%
139 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 628K followers, an engagement rate of 0.933%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 13.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jeffery Mead's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.933%, Jeffery Mead sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 236 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20269.3x their median

    This is a perfect case showing the LIE that Republicans don’t like black people. Republicans literally elected a black man to run a GOP stronghold. It’s about ideas, beliefs, culture, and values. Not skin color. https://t.co/I4rfVeyAVF

    44K7.6K1.7K251698K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20268.2x their median

    A black person speaking with articulation is not a “white person thing”. Articulation doesn’t belong to a skin color. Black people actually degrade themselves when attacking other black people for “sounding white”. https://t.co/8bANUantyj

    40K6.3K994179339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.8x their median

    Just a reminder, all of those "racists republicans" just voted for a black man to run the state of Florida.

    31K2.2K52665319K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20265.7x their median

    The poorest billionaire in California will make about $300 million this year. If we pass the CA wealth tax, he will only make $235 million. In exchange, millions of the poorest Californians will get health insurance. That's the tradeoff billionaires are not willing to make.

    25K3.3K4.1K222612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.6x their median

    This is very clear evidence of a problematic culture. Black Americans as a whole have a culture problem and our standards are too low.. We have to fix the culture. https://t.co/3pU4fVCmc8

    23K3.2K701110292K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.0x their median

    The only thing standing between Lindsay Clancy and being found not guilty was a lone black man. After figuring that out, Gale King then said she needs to “sit with that for just a second”. https://t.co/3UwG7H7Oql

    20K2.7K75166170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.7x their median

    Somalis are roughly 0.17% of Bostons population and started getting there in the 1970’s. Boston was incorporated in 1822. She is lying through her teeth. https://t.co/RuyACcZIPv

    17K3.5K442102128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.1x their median

    This the the truth that the Pro Palestine crowd continues to ignore and acts like doesn’t exist. It’s not convenient to the narrative they want to push, so it gets ignored. https://t.co/1F6c1vgvmT

    14K3.5K39799150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.0x their median

    Democrat lies falling flat on their face. The more black people that wake up to this reality, the more issues democrats will have winning elections. https://t.co/tENCaW2ANV

    15K2.6K21457117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.8x their median

    This could have been anyone’s daughter.. This is definitely worth a watch and also extremely sad to see. This man absolutely exposed these democrat politicians. https://t.co/vzorjz5ivQ

    14K2.7K1325291K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.8K interactions against 628K followers, an engagement rate of 0.933%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 13.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

What is Jeffery Mead's engagement rate on X?
Jeffery Mead (@the_jefferymead) has an engagement rate of 0.933%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 628,281 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.933%, Jeffery Mead sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @the_jefferymead have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @the_jefferymead post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going