Back to @terencecrawford's profile

Terence Crawford engagement report

@terencecrawford - 525K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.727%
of 525K followers
Per impression
1.65%
231K views on a typical post
Reach
44.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
110 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 525K followers, an engagement rate of 0.727%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 231K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 44.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Terence Crawford's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.727%, Terence Crawford sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 148 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 15, 202624x their median

    This the guy that said he would knock me out and whoop me and Shakur at the same time?😂😂😂

    35K3.0K1.7K50910M viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 2026

    😭😭😭 they mad!!! It’s coo when they do it, it’s a problem when I do it, FUCK EM!!!! Fuck Teo, Fuck his Daddy, fuck his Sister and anyone else that has a problem.

    27K3.8K9935861.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20266.5x their median

    I’ll fuck @RyanGarcia up so bad people going to be calling the law on me talking about child abuse. Like why did you do that to that little boy you knew he was just talking for the entertainment. Here I am 🤷🏿‍♂️🤣

    21K1.5K1.5K3801.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.4x their median

    Congratulations @RyanGarcia mf

    16K63828682696K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.6x their median

    42-0 Former #1 best fighter in the world P4P 5 division world champion 3x undisputed 4x unified champion 2x FOTY 3x ESPY award winner best fighter 20 consecutive title fights Hall Of Famer soon to be Sorry but not sorry for being great. Hate on yo momma.🤪✌🏿🎤

    11K1.4K942266755K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20263.1x their median

    Ima keep my comments to myself, but yall get it I hope.😂

    9.0K9881.5K5961.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    Mf really think I would come back and fight a coke head yall stupid as shit. What really be wrong with people! Ima keep talking because I can and not none of yall gone do shit but listen like you post to.

    9.1K7086161652.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.4x their median

    It’s ok @RyanGarcia ima let you live because you got way too many people to worry about other than me my boy! @Realdevinhaney @KeyshawnDavis8 @ShakurStevenson @HeIsRichardson @TeofimoLopez them guys who you need to worry about not me. I know you want that check tho.😉

    7.7K50984992578K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20262.2x their median

    Still till this day no matter what yall say or how you feel Boxing is still and will forever be the hardest sport to do at a top level. 🤫

    6.0K6491.6K3203.9M viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20262.1x their median

    Still wishing @ErrolSpenceJr the best in his upcoming fight. I see what yall trying to do, but it’s not going to work, not this time.

    7.2K72717755435K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.8K interactions against 525K followers, an engagement rate of 0.727%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 231K times each, and 1.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 44.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Terence Crawford's engagement rate on X?
Terence Crawford (@terencecrawford) has an engagement rate of 0.727%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 524,923 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.727%, Terence Crawford sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @terencecrawford have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @terencecrawford post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going