Back to @tequieremos's profile

Fidato engagement report

@tequieremos - 144K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.113%
of 144K followers
Per impression
3.13%
5.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
163
interactions (median)
Saved
0.192%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 3.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 9.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fidato's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.113%, Fidato sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 729 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 17, 20219.5x their median

    The recent act of terrorism against the Hazaras has raised questions. Which terrorist groups carried out the attack? Is the state appeasing terrorists or fighting them? In this thread, I would give a factual account of what has happened in the last two decades in Balochistan.

    96938610489View on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.1x their median

    It is baffling to see Iran-aligned Houthis attacking Makkah. The quest for control over the strategic Bab el-Mandeb made sense, but Houthi attacks on holy sites such as Makkah and Taif look more like the work of an IRGC-Mossad wing. Such a step will only provoke serious and wider retaliation from the Muslim world potentially far beyond the scope of the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement. To situate this development in the broader scheme, all this is happening when the U.S. is expected to launch another offensive. And what could serve Israel and the U.S. better than a conflict that pits the Muslim world against Iran? Beyond this war, Iran could emerge seriously weakened, if not totally under U.S. thumb. Meanwhile, the Houthis are unlikely to sustain their hold over southwestern Sunni Yemen, though the war would also be highly draining for the anti-Houthi front. In such a situation, Iran weakened, Yemen exhausted, and the Mecca Pact tied down in Yemen, the biggest beneficiary would be Israel. Iran needs to clarify its position.

    441851241826K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.5x their median

    Pakistan once had players who took responsibility. Inzi was one of them. Ahmedabad, 2005. 🇵🇰🇮🇳 Sachin: 123 (130) Pakistan chasing 316. Final over. Pakistan needed 3. Sachin had the ball. Four dot balls. Then Inzamam calmly took 2 off the fifth and smashed the final ball through the off side for FOUR! Pakistan won by 3 wickets. Inzi 60 off 59.* No panic. No excuses. Just class under pressure. Those were the days. 🇵🇰🏏

    521419696K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.5x their median

    When the Afghan Taliban emerged in 1994, they captured a dump in Pashai Ghund in Spin Boldak. This huge cache consisted of 17 tunnels worth of ammunition and weapons, enough to supply three divisions. After which the Taliban faced few problems arming itself. By 5th November, Taliban took Kandahar. Today Pakistan has destroyed the biggest Taliban camp in Spin Boldak with deadly strikes. This will have a huge psychological impact on the Taliban leadership!

    4578221626K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.8x their median

    Pakistan has firmly established that no act of terrorism by the Taliban will go unpunished, as demonstrated by its latest strikes. These strikes came after the Taliban repeatedly refused to guarantee action against terrorist sanctuaries and even reportedly misbehaved with mediating Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin, who was visiting Kabul and Kandahar. Reportedly, Mr. Kalin visited Kandahar to meet Akhunzada, but he refused to meet. This is their behaviour towards Muslims, while they continue to pander to the extremist Indian regime to the extent of claiming to share the “same DNA.” It is hard not to notice the similarity with ISIS, which would behead Muslims but apologize for mistakenly attacking Israel. No matter how much the Taliban gratify the Indians, they will not save them. If ammunition depots and launch pads were hit yesterday, Mullah Yaqoob could be next!

    23444919.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    No wonder why world leaders fell seriously ill during the BRICS summit in India. https://t.co/MLB7txcCH1

    196352224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    Finally we saw a glimpse of the real Pakistan cricket thanks to Razaullah and Abbas!

    1608314.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Another day, another terror attack by Afghan-based terror groups, and 12 precious lives lost in D.I. Khan. The Taliban regime seems to have learnt no lesson. Now, Pakistan must up the ante. If they are playing to their strength – terrorism – why should Pakistan not go for the snake’s head? Because things are now way past talks. Pakistan has exhausted all possible forums. At the intelligence level, Pakistan shared more than 200 intelligence notes with the Afghan regime. At the border, local commanders held more than 200 flag meetings. Diplomatically, Pakistan issued more than 800 protest notes and summoned the Afghan ambassador more than 170 times. The Joint Coordination Committee, a high-level civil-military forum, met 10 times. At the leadership level, there were five visits involving the foreign, defence and interior ministers, along with visits by ulema and civil society representatives. Friendly states also intervened. China did so three times, while Qatar and Türkiye also tried, but to no effect.

    112251703.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    نعتِ رسولِ کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم شاعر: پیر نصیرالدین نصیر اب تنگی داماں پہ نہ جا اور بھی کچھ مانگ
ہیں آج وہ مائل بہ عطا اور بھی کچھ مانگ ہیں وہ متوجہ’ تو دعا اور بھی کچھ مانگ،
جو کچھ تجھے ملنا تھا ملا’ اور بھی کچھ مانگ ہر چند کے مولا نے بھرا ہے تیرا کشکول
کم ظرف نہ بن ہاتھ بڑھا’ اور بھی کچھ مانگ چھو کر ابھی آی ہے سر زلف محمد
کیا چاہیے اے باد صبا اور بھی کچھ مانگ یا سرور دیں’ شاہ عرب’ رحمت عالم
دے کر تہ دل سے یہ صدا اور بھی کچھ مانگ سرکار کا در ہے در شاہاں تو نہیں ہے
جو مانگ لیا مانگ لیا اور بھی کچھ مانگ جن لوگوں کو یہ شک ہے کرم ان کا ہے محدود
ان لوگوں کی باتوں پے نہ جا اور بھی کچھ مانگ اس در پے یہ انجام ہوا حسن طلب کا
جھولی میری بھر بھر کے کہا اور بھی کچھ مانگ سلطان مدینہ کی زیارت کی دعا کر
جنت کی طلب چیز ہے کیا اور بھی کچھ مانگ دے سکتے ہیں کیا کچھ کے وہ کچھ دے نہیں سکتے
یہ بحث نہ کر ہوش میں آ اور بھی کچھ مانگ مانا کے اسی در سے غنی ہو کے اٹھا ہے
پھر بھی در سرکار پہ جا اور بھی کچھ مانگ پہنچا ہے جو اس در پے تو رہ رہ کے نصیر آج
آواز پہ آواز لگا اور بھی کچھ مانگ

    10315405.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    Well we needed a five match test series 😂

    1074404.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 3.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 9.5x its own typical post.

What is Fidato's engagement rate on X?
Fidato (@tequieremos) has an engagement rate of 0.113%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,174 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.113%, Fidato sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tequieremos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tequieremos post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going