PlayerSells
Back to @teddspotting's profile

Teddy Corpuz engagement report

@teddspotting - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.593%
8.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
48
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 0.593% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.503% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 237x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026. Recurring tag: #showtimemadlangonliners.

Compared with accounts its own size

Teddy Corpuz's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Teddy Corpuz sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 2026237x their median

    I have NEVER seen anything like this ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/RbOZXrSRYu

    10K794387162905K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 2026176x their median

    Wemby just said on ABC that you canโ€™t win a 7-game series vs the defending champs by random chance. WRONG. Spurs won because of the random injuries suffered by Jalen Williams and Ajay Mitchell, OKCโ€™s 2nd and 3rd best players.

    6.7K4441.1K148486K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026122x their median

    Congratulations Alexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are so, so, so proud of you!๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ญ https://t.co/OTMajLtWCC

    5.3K458261250K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 202644x their median

    Naglalaro ako ng Call of Duty pero okay naman ako. Okay naman mental health ko at anger management ko. I think the issue has something to do with better education system, tighter security sa mga schools, responsible gun owners, and better parenting also. Dun nga sa baskeball court may nag barilan at saksakan din because of pikunan sa game, so pa ban narin natin baskedball sa bansa? Pag ban yung mga ganitong klaseng games mawawala na ang ganyan types of crimes committed by minors? Ang daming factors na need iconsider, pag aralan at baguhin pero kabobohan yung shortcut route.

    1.2K206154544181K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202644x their median

    This would be the most physically imposing frontline in NBA history. My GOODNESSโ€ฆ ๐Ÿคฏ https://t.co/76Eu7VXq11

    2.0K10030636K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202641x their median

    The foul merchant Victor Wembanyama scored 26 points on 6-21 shooting and 12/13 FTโ€™s ๐Ÿคฎ https://t.co/iUrPBOcULc

    1.7K16034937K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202634x their median

    2 billion people saw the reason Shai is the best in the world https://t.co/eNEDtXFxUK

    1.5K91651041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202633x their median

    Panalo talaga sa QC. Nag cancel ng classes para lang sa public so may pasok pa rin yung private schools. Ngayon mag cacancel ng private pero naka pasok na at nasa school na yung mga bata. Water proof, baha proof at bagyo proof pala sa private? https://t.co/TGfrObxFcJ

    1.4K615418394K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202626x their median

    HAHAHAHAHAHAH @teddspotting #ShowtimeTumpak https://t.co/qic9kilQto

    1.2K524323K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202622x their median

    Galing mag sulat in english ah, bakit parang hindi mo style at parang hindi ikaw ang nagsulat? AI ba yan o gawa ng tropa o staff mo? Feeling ko pag pinaulit sayo yan di mo kayang isulat o sabihin ulit. ๐Ÿ˜‚

    1.0K19122342K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#showtimemadlangonliners

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 0.593% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.503% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 237x its own typical post.

What is Teddy Corpuz's engagement rate on X?
Teddy Corpuz (@teddspotting) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,625,556 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Teddy Corpuz sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @teddspotting have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @teddspotting post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going