Back to @teamspeak's profile

TeamSpeak engagement report

@teamspeak - 238K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.371%
of 238K followers
Per impression
2.06%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
18.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
884
interactions (median)
Saved
0.168%
72 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 884 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.371%. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 74x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.371%, TeamSpeak sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 273 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 29, 202574x their median

    https://t.co/rpwDMUywIV

    64K9533901063.2M viewsView on X
  • Feb 9, 202650x their median

    Discord will age-restrict users from certain features starting next month unless the user sends a face scan or ID. (Source: https://t.co/cqNifARp2Z) https://t.co/Wjz70VXA1R

    34K2.3K1.9K5.9K27M viewsView on X
  • Nov 4, 202527x their median

    seriously does anyone know why the fuck discord does this https://t.co/MCB4J28GRn

    23K6592981562.1M viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 202624x their median

    https://t.co/rMR3OZJhso

    19K8749814186.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20259.6x their median

    lol according to leaks from the recent Discord hack there was an internal document list of "Accounts That We Should Not Interact With" featuring myself, the US Army, and Keem. Never thought I'd see Slasher and Keemstar silenced together https://t.co/LtZCFgksoP

    7.7K2811673172.4M viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 20259.2x their median

    🧹 Discord is finally "fixing" memory leaks! /s The client is testing a feature that monitors its own RAM usage and performs an intentional restart to clear resources if it reaches 4 GB while you're AFK. No restarts occur if you're currently in a call. https://t.co/pNZbnIlw5j

    6.9K2102857238.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 20267.3x their median

    this didn't age well 😭😭 https://t.co/AGg2qhVCUt

    5.7K2603461562.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.1x their median

    announcement. tomorrow. vamos! https://t.co/3L1Osjhnyr

    5.9K15217259340K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20255.9x their median

    Custom themes are here and your Discord doesn't have to look like everyone else's anymore. Pick up to 5 colors, any gradients, and create the perfect look for your client. Now available with Nitro https://t.co/l0Vvs7KvLw

    4.2K2834193431.2M viewsView on X
  • Nov 26, 20255.0x their median

    why are we actually getting more users lately... https://t.co/JM4EYI6vD1

    4.2K6419214493K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 884 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.371%. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 2.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 74x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is TeamSpeak's engagement rate on X?
TeamSpeak (@teamspeak) has an engagement rate of 0.371%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.371%, TeamSpeak sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @teamspeak have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @teamspeak post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going