Back to @teameffujoe's profile

Joe Redden | The Older Millennial engagement report

@teameffujoe - 304K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.262%
of 304K followers
Per impression
6.40%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
797
interactions (median)
Saved
0.281%
35 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 797 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.262%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 6.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #florida, #cala, #chicago.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #florida, #cala, #chicago.

Compared with accounts its own size

Joe Redden | The Older Millennial's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.262%, Joe Redden | The Older Millennial sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video87% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 87% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 12, 202645x their median

    🚨WTF: Trump’s FBI just RAIDED the DC apartment of Rep. Ilhan Omar as “part of an ongoing criminal investigation” relating to immigration papers she filled out THREE DECADES ago. This is PURE banana republic shit and should send chills down EVERY American’s spine - especially after Trump’s racist attacks on Somalis.

    24K7.4K4.2K433538K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202624x their median

    Trump team thinks it's a good idea to do public executions for traitors. Interesting, because Jonathan Pollard, the worst traitor we've ever had, was not executed or given a life sentence. He was flown back to Israel on Miriam Adelson's private jet and given a hero's welcome.

    16K3.0K58578336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202616x their median

    I want to physically beat the shit out of everyone involved in the Lanterns show. https://t.co/JhlnjIRhFF

    10K8661.4K276962K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    The fact that Tucker Carlson wasn’t invited to speak at TPUSA this year, and Ben Shapiro was, will tell you all you need to know.

    10K8171612294K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20269.0x their median

    So Thomas Massie finally decided to read the list of names of the “Epstein co-conspirators” that he’s claimed to have for months now: • Jes Staley • Leon Black • Les Wexner • David Copperfield • Lapo Elkann • Tom Pritzker • Glenn Dubin • Frederic Fekkai • Eduardo Teodorani • Jean-Luc Brunel • Daniel Siad • Ramsey Elkholy • Prince Andrew • Leslie Groff Only one problem: Every name Massie read was ALREADY linked to Epstein. All this information was already public. Nothing new was revealed from this. Massie’s “list” was a nothing burger. Congratulations Massie simps, you got conned again.

    5.9K93823776139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.1x their median

    Funny how @cenkuygur seems to have very different opinions about DOJ raids depending on which party does them. https://t.co/m1j6S4FwaJ

    4.0K747803767K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.9x their median

    Wow. @NBCNews manipulated the footage. https://t.co/dr1Ikb0Gmt

    3.7K857462362K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.6x their median

    $266,000,000 to renovate the projects? $900,000 per apartment? Yeah, that’s called money laundering. https://t.co/Zb1JV0t9vo

    3.4K922842428K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.8x their median

    Sorry liberals, but we don’t care that @sophaller dates black men. https://t.co/H0PDJ502nX

    3.3K322215459K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.5x their median

    Ma’am, how in the FUCK are you claiming to be the victim in this? @SarahisCensored simply reported on your lies and yall lost your race baiting minds! https://t.co/h4qmZ9jlw6

    2.9K63650433K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#florida#cala#chicago#newyork

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 797 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.262%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 6.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #florida, #cala, #chicago.

What is Joe Redden | The Older Millennial's engagement rate on X?
Joe Redden | The Older Millennial (@teameffujoe) has an engagement rate of 0.262%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 304,095 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.262%, Joe Redden | The Older Millennial sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @teameffujoe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @teameffujoe post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going