Back to @tbpn's profile

TBPN engagement report

@tbpn - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 146 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.476%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
1.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
153
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.3/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 153 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 146 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.476% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 146 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 232x its own typical post.

Measured over 146 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TBPN's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, TBPN sits above the 10th percentile of the 208,131 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.144%
p750.683%
p902.57%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 208,131 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,311 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.144%
75th percentile0.683%
90th percentile2.57%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 398 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 2026232x their median

    Before and after of the new US passport https://t.co/TQuf5Zxh6j

    33K99793057513M viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 2025249x their median

    https://t.co/a3htzba32g

    30K1.4K3467044.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202645x their median

    .@jayleno says the middle of the consumer market is disappearing, from cars to hotels to restaurants. "The middle is dead." "I see Porsche moving upscale and they want to be like Ferrari." "Everything is that way now. With hotels, you're either at the Motel 6 or the Four Seasons." "Restaurants are either fast food or top end restaurant." "We have no middle class anymore."

    6.0K583190141523K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202637x their median

    Insane elbow violation by zuck here https://t.co/h7QzP2wBwl

    5.1K1322201462.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202630x their median

    BREAKING: NVIDIA agrees to buy Hugging Face for $12.9B, per The Information https://t.co/HREEB1bRqg

    4.0K262116185406K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202628x their median

    BREAKING: @KDTrey5 reportedly turned $250K into $60M from his investment in Hugging Face https://t.co/Cwtq9YXc3q

    4.0K1448479337K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202626x their median

    McLaren got a rebrand https://t.co/5okJHyFaJJ

    2.1K828099593.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202620x their median

    For two years, @WalterIsaacson lived in an Airstream next to Elon Musk while writing his biography. Isaacson didn't want a book built on a series of interviews. Instead, he got near-constant access to observe Musk firsthand. That's how he saw Musk's "demon mode" up close. Here's how he describes the mood swings: "He gets really dark and really difficult. He just goes silent." "There are people like Gwynne Shotwell and [Tesla design chief] Franz von Holzhausen who know how to push him out of demon mode. He also knows how to get himself together when he goes on stage." "It depends on what's crossing his mind at the moment. It's almost like a storm cloud coming in off the Gulf." "There'd be times I'd watch him go into demon mode. I'd be sitting at dinner at a restaurant in Austin and Grimes would be next to me, and she'd say, 'Oh, demon mode's about to come.'" "I'd watch people text Gwynne to come run into the conference room when he's about to kill Falcon Heavy or something." And he doesn't think Musk has gotten any less mercurial, either.

    2.7K11027830386K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202619x their median

    BREAKING: TIME Magazine declares that Jensen Huang is NOT one of the 100 most influential people in AI https://t.co/4Vyd11gCIl

    2.4K5227691263K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202617x their median

    BREAKING: It’s PT’s birthday https://t.co/nYFpSYscPD

    2.4K130984284K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 153 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 146 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.476% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 146 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 232x its own typical post.

What is TBPN's engagement rate on X?
TBPN (@tbpn) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 146 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,646,179 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, TBPN sits above the 10th percentile of the 208,131 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tbpn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tbpn post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going