Back to @taxguru_in's profile

Tax Guru engagement report

@taxguru_in - 188K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 188K followers
Per impression
0.085%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 188K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 518 interactions, about 259x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tax Guru's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Tax Guru sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 263 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 2026259x their median

    Punjab Accountants Association seeks extension of Tax Audit Report due date for AY 2026-27 from 30 Sept to 31 Oct 2026, citing increased disclosures, staggered ITR utilities and the need for adequate time for verification, reconciliation and professional review. https://t.co/1uw6N1Ykqo

    2093034211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026186x their median

    Tax Bar Association, Bhilwara seeks extension of Tax Audit Reports and Forms 10B/10BB due date for AY 2026-27 from 30 Sept to 31 Oct 2026, citing delayed ITR utilities, increased reporting and limited audit time. https://t.co/7NHw4sWeL2

    145221326.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026120x their median

    Chandigarh Chartered Accountants Taxation Association seeks extension of Tax Audit, Forms 10B/10BB and audit-case ITR due dates for AY 2026-27, citing delayed utilities, portal issues and increased compliance. https://t.co/w132EkVIyO

    94143215.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202696x their median

    Tax Bar Association, Bhilwara seeks extension of Tax Audit Reports (3CA/3CB & 3CD) and Forms 10B/10BB for AY 2026-27 from 30 Sept to 31 Oct 2026, citing late ITR utilities, revised ICAI requirements and compressed audit timelines. https://t.co/7NHw4sVGVu

    69122103.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202687x their median

    Tax audit deadline crisis: 8 of 9 completed AY cycles saw extensions. The recurring 30 Sept deadline signals flawed compliance design. A better framework: one realistic common deadline, electronic sequencing, stable utilities and transparent extension rules. https://t.co/yiJ3h9VQRL

    81892117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20267.0x their median

    Delhi ITAT: Rent paid to earn subletting income is deductible u/s 57. Where ₹13.20 lakh sub-rent was accepted as “Other Sources” income, ₹5.40 lakh rent, ₹30,000 repairs & ₹1.20 lakh caretaker expenses were allowed. https://t.co/rI0pF9pMTQ

    77003.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.5x their median

    GST scrutiny under Section 61 is not an audit. The officer can examine returns and related particulars already furnished, including GSTR-9C financial statements, but cannot use scrutiny to demand fresh books/records—such deeper examination belongs under Section 65. https://t.co/JJfkgioPhj

    74004.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.0x their median

    One missed notice need not trigger penalty where reasonable cause exists: ITAT Delhi deletes ₹10,000 penalties u/s 272A(1)(d) for 2 years, noting subsequent full compliance and cooperation. Section 273B protects plausibly explained defaults. https://t.co/SCLG47D6Qb

    52106.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.0x their median

    Delhi ITAT: “Penny stock” label alone cannot justify treating genuine LTCG as unexplained cash credit u/s 68. Without evidence linking the assessee or broker to price rigging, documentary evidence of purchase, demat holding & sale cannot be discarded. https://t.co/qcE7ZYLB1Q

    53004.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.5x their median

    Landmark GST Ruling! Punjab & Haryana HC upholds Section 16(2)(c) but rules that ITC cannot be mechanically reversed for supplier default. Genuine buyers deserve proper inquiry and hearing. Supplier fraud cannot automatically be attributed to buyers. https://t.co/qES7xQJTcz

    52002.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 188K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 518 interactions, about 259x its own typical post.

What is Tax Guru's engagement rate on X?
Tax Guru (@taxguru_in) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 187,999 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Tax Guru sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @taxguru_in have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @taxguru_in post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going