Back to @tatu_clow's profile

▕⃝⃤ engagement report

@tatu_clow - 82K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 82K followers
Per impression
4.01%
698 views on a typical post
Reach
0.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 698 times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.849% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 530x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #nuevafotodeperfil.

Compared with accounts its own size

▕⃝⃤'s engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, ▕⃝⃤ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 82 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026530x their median

    🚨🚨🚨 Wendy Guevara is the special guest for the confessional on the final night of the LUX TOUR in Mexico. https://t.co/zgtaU7I2gT

    14K65876263438K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026379x their median

    now kiss https://t.co/0ronNDRWKv

    9.6K7371101821.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026252x their median

    Yo les cuento un chisme presidencial con BTS me protegen?

    6.4K386106152232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026207x their median

    #Bogotá 🧵 | El Instituto de Patrimonio Cultural inició un proceso de revisión y sanción por la modificación, sin autorización, de una escalera original en uno de los apartamentos del conjunto Altos de Santana en Bogotá, obra del arquitecto Rogelio Salmona, declarado Bien de Interés Cultural. https://t.co/woHMRjVE2M

    5.1K331158194950K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026161x their median

    Oigan pero a Bogotá la está matando esos hijueputas aparta Estudios de 1,600,000 y 2,000,000 pesos osea que ???? Sean serios perros

    4.3K1305114121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026155x their median

    Harry and Hedwig ❤️ https://t.co/MsonANM7cH

    3.6K66115112955K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026122x their median

    🚨 Alerta sanitaria en Rusia: mujer muere de peste tras romper un tubo de ensayo y 197 personas quedan en cuarentena. https://t.co/oJVTPhDCLJ

    2.7K5945478176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202663x their median

    Mi hermana se lesionó en el gym y la llevamos al hospital, sale el ortopeda y le dice: “Deje de levantar peso, la mujer tiene que ser mujer” JAJAJAJAJAJAJ un poquito más y la mandaba para la cocina el hpta

    1.7K3210516K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202633x their median

    Una señora en la oficina pensaba que BTS es una inteligencia artificial jajajajaajaj

    85145211614K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202631x their median

    Me van a funar, pero la caracas se ve tan feita con todo eso del metro

    695141491925K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nuevafotodeperfil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 698 times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.849% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 530x its own typical post.

What is ▕⃝⃤'s engagement rate on X?
▕⃝⃤ (@tatu_clow) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,244 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, ▕⃝⃤ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tatu_clow have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tatu_clow post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going