Back to @tarcisiogdf's profile

Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas engagement report

@tarcisiogdf - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.358%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
15.8%
74K views on a typical post
Reach
2.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.065%
48 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.358%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 15.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.358%, Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 317 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 23, 20264.7x their median

    Definitivamente, o Brasil não suporta mais quatro anos de Lula e do PT. Por isso, domingo é Flávio 22 e CONFIRMA! 🇧🇷 https://t.co/dOPmk0KAoF

    43K11K937297314K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.8x their median

    Será que dessa vez o Lula tá sabendo? 🤔 https://t.co/ZxU4XOh21b

    34K10K514229256K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.8x their median

    O Brasil precisa de um presidente que saiba o que fazer, tenha coragem para tomar as decisões certas e competência para colocar o país de volta no caminho do desenvolvimento e da prosperidade! https://t.co/SdZJ7vGjFI

    35K8.1K643186397K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.3x their median

    Ouvir um desabafo como esse mostra o tamanho da hipocrisia do PT e da esquerda, que simplesmente somem diante do que está acontecendo hoje na Amazônia. Muita gente tenta vender a ideia de que cuidar do meio ambiente é exclusividade de um campo político. Mas nós provamos, em São Paulo, que um governo de direita pode fazer muito. E fazer de verdade! Aqui, preservação ambiental e desenvolvimento caminham juntos. E os resultados estão aí! Em 2025, reduzimos em 91% a área atingida por incêndios nas unidades de conservação estaduais, em comparação com 2024. Em agosto de 2026, São Paulo registrou o menor número de focos de calor para o mês desde o início da série histórica, em 1998. Mobilizamos mais de R$ 400 milhões em ações de prevenção e combate às queimadas, investimos em tecnologia, monitoramento por satélite e inteligência artificial para identificar focos de incêndio e agir mais rápido. Também alcançamos mais de 44 mil hectares em processo de restauração florestal e incorporamos 13,2 mil hectares às áreas protegidas do estado. Na recuperação dos nossos rios, já são R$ 22 bilhões em investimentos no IntegraTietê, mais de 1,5 milhão de domicílios conectados à rede de esgoto e 6,5 milhões de metros cúbicos de sedimentos retirados da bacia do Tietê. E os resultados já aparecem: reduzimos em quase 30% a carga de poluição orgânica do Rio Tietê, e a mancha de poluição recuou 33 quilômetros, uma redução de aproximadamente 16%! Tudo isso sem abrir mão do desenvolvimento econômico, da geração de empregos e do crescimento de São Paulo. Cuidar do meio ambiente não é uma questão de ideologia. É uma questão de responsabilidade, compromisso com as próximas gerações e, acima de tudo, trabalho! É assim que estamos fazendo em São Paulo. Com menos discurso, menos cantoria e mais resultado!

    28K10.0K503243181K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.3x their median

    Obrigado, São Paulo! https://t.co/VGnyQOJzwp

    33K3.9K1.4K164177K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.2x their median

    De um lado, brasileiros que foram às ruas de verde e amarelo, com suas famílias, defendendo o futuro do nosso país. Do outro, cenas de vandalismo, depredação e intolerância. São duas formas muito diferentes de se manifestar. A democracia garante o direito de protestar, mas nunca o direito de destruir. O Brasil precisa de paz! 🇧🇷

    27K8.3K1.0K237201K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.6x their median

    De um lado, brasileiros que foram às ruas de verde e amarelo, com suas famílias, defendendo o futuro do nosso país. Do outro, cenas de vandalismo, depredação e intolerância. São duas formas muito diferentes de se manifestar. A democracia garante o direito de protestar, mas nunca o direito de destruir. O Brasil precisa de paz! 🇧🇷

    23K6.3K807108118K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20262.5x their median

    Depois de 20 anos, já ficou claro: o PT não tem condições morais de governar o Brasil! https://t.co/rW3BGzrXWD

    23K5.6K59972103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.5x their median

    Um gesto de grandeza em nome de um projeto maior. Ricardo Salles decidiu retirar sua candidatura ao Senado e declarou apoio a @DerriteSP e @andredopradosp . Obrigado, Ricardo, por esse gesto e pela defesa da união do nosso campo político nesta reta final. Seguimos ainda mais fortes, rumo à vitória!

    23K4.4K1.1K191221K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.4x their median

    O voto é secreto, mas… - Eu não quero um governo esbanjando o dinheiro público. - Eu quero menos impostos e menos burocracia. - Eu acredito em um país livre do PT. Vote Flávio Bolsonaro. Vote 22! https://t.co/utxDNBWC9W

    23K4.2K32753106K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.358%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 15.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

What is Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas's engagement rate on X?
Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas (@tarcisiogdf) has an engagement rate of 0.358%, based on the median interactions across 83 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,248,292 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.358%, Tarcísio Gomes de Freitas sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tarcisiogdf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tarcisiogdf post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going