Back to @tankman2002's profile

二大爷 engagement report

@tankman2002 - 363K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.21%
of 363K followers
Per impression
0.605%
126K views on a typical post
Reach
34.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
760
interactions (median)
Saved
0.031%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 760 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 126K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 5.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

二大爷's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.21%, 二大爷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link27% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20265.5x their median

    航拍显示,西藏这边的吉隆口岸已经被泥石流全埋,只漏出一个屋顶还依稀可辨。这种情况下,很难有生还者了。有网友质疑为何在这种事故多发地段建口岸。这是没办法的——古往今来交通要道就在这里,古代修关隘也是这种地方,山上修不了。即便先知先觉加固周边山体,修挡土墙,在这种级别的天灾面前,可能也没有用。

    3.7K22626515918K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20264.5x their median

    我发现有些人真是天真到令人发指啊。好了伤疤立马就忘了痛——说什么出入境新规又不是针对普通人的,很好。土改、镇反、公私合营、四清、文革……你看看中国闭关锁国的前几十年的政策那个明面上是针对普通人的?但有那一个普通人能够置身事外呢。你是不是“普通人”,就跟你会不会寻衅滋事一样,全在国家给的脸色中。 介绍信出门的日子才过去30年,忘得一干二净。聪明人管中窥豹,一叶落而知天下秋。而现实中的蠢货,叶子铺了一地,他都能假装春天还在。

    2.8K1294897283K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20263.1x their median

    中国这个出入境新规空前加大了边控的力度和范围,即便和体制不沾边的的普通人,今后出境也将面临诸多难题,因为可以把你堵在机场的理由实在太宽泛了。满打满算,中国人能相对自由的办理护照和出国的日子,才20年不到,竟然快到头了。 https://t.co/XlBRr6hysJ

    1.5K18163815543K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.0x their median

    不算冷的冷知识:中国普通人能无需任何前置条件申办护照出国,是2007年《中华人民共和国护照法》施行之后的事。至今不到20年。普通人法律上能在国内自由流动,也是2003年孙志刚事件全面废除收容制度之后,至今也才23年。

    1.9K1253207283K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.9x their median

    以前水灾,不管是总理还是总书记,总归还是要出来秀一秀。现在一尊不出中南海,别人也不敢抢这个风头,只有一个水利部长出马,终究还是不演了。 https://t.co/wMBilB1SXi

    1.5K6659817683K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.5x their median

    客观的说,在矮子中拔将军的话,江泽民毕竟是民国大学生,工程师出身,在邓小平之后的中共领导人中,学识最高,修养最好,最有人味。他在位时期,相较于胡锦涛和习近平,舆论环境更宽松,对外也更柔和。那时候异议人士还可以发声出书,公开调侃领导人的段子满天飞,社会生态更具活力。当然,腐败和结党是其在任弊端,选择习近平接班更是不可饶恕的败笔。总体来说,后来者相较于他,确实图样图森破。

    1.4K5538819512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.3x their median

    川普霸凌加拿大,导致美加谈判破裂。对于忠诚的盟友下死手,对于独裁的敌人抛媚眼。但是大家注意到没有,那一大群寄生在加拿大的独轮运小丑,从来没有为自己的国家站过台,反而是不断谩骂和指责捍卫加拿大尊严和利益的卡尼。这帮川皇忠诚的黄皮舔狗,在哪都是一副人渣的嘴脸。

    1.5K482276136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.2x their median

    今天,是长崎遭到原子弹袭击的81周年纪念日。81年前,这样的悲剧之所以会降临在日本的头上,无外乎就是因为美国有了原子弹,而我们没有。所以,现在为了避免遭受中国这样的流氓国家的恫吓和威胁,日本必须尽快拥有作为抗衡力的核武器。我作为一个国会议员,也将为达到这一目标而努力。

    8114276587517K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.0x their median

    那时候的总书记和总理算是同事,现在则是君臣。中共高层的政治生态70多年,也就正常过20年。 https://t.co/2Ww0iVhmQf

    1.3K461915243K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.9x their median

    景甜还是吃了没文化的亏,找个人写个像样的小作文反击啊。 https://t.co/MfMAfmAHSc

    925144714389K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 760 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 126K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.2K interactions, about 5.5x its own typical post.

What is 二大爷's engagement rate on X?
二大爷 (@tankman2002) has an engagement rate of 0.21%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 362,552 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.21%, 二大爷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tankman2002 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tankman2002 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going