TalkFCB © engagement report
@talkfcb_ - 398K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 432 interactions against 398K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
TalkFCB ©'s engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.109%, TalkFCB © sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 57% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 64% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 64% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 18, 202222x their median
❝Estoy en el Barça para ayudar a devolverlo al lugar donde se merece❞ RL https://t.co/PQNIJNMvLN
- Aug 14, 202629x their median
Genuinely feel like we’ve entered the strikers market a summer late.
- Aug 16, 202627x their median
Rodri Pedri Fermín De Jong Gavi Bernal Olmo This might be the best midfield depth ever…
- Aug 15, 202614x their median
One the things I especially won’t miss about Ferran is the stupid hands to his ears celebration or shushing celebration towards his own fans - when he finally scored a goal after about 50 missed chances. Nearly every goal he scored he celebrated like this.
- Aug 30, 20269.0x their median
🚨 PIERRE-EMERICK AUBAMEYANG OWNS LA LIGA! WHAT A PLAYER! 🇬🇦 https://t.co/PXbn1J1gpy
- Aug 23, 20268.2x their median
Crazy that Haaland signed a nine-year-deal for this 😭 https://t.co/FNALUJK24Y
- Aug 13, 20267.8x their median
Done deal. Barça receive €50M for Ferran. Bye 👋 https://t.co/HdWegxYbyB
- Aug 19, 20266.7x their median
How many genuine ‘superstars’ currently play in the Premier League? Could you argue… one?
- Aug 15, 20265.8x their median
It’s one of the most La Liga things ever to start the brand new season with only four random matches on the opening weekend. Just… why?
- Aug 16, 20264.4x their median
RODRI IS COMING TO BARÇA!!!!! ➡️ https://t.co/o0ce1CkyDw https://t.co/YvjnL8k72C
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 432 interactions against 398K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 3.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is TalkFCB ©'s engagement rate on X?
- TalkFCB © (@talkfcb_) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 397,929 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.109%, TalkFCB © sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @talkfcb_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @talkfcb_ post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.