PlayerSells
Back to @talkSPORT's profile

talkSPORT engagement report

@talkSPORT - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 158 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
0.092%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
1.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.37/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 158 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.092% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 158 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #moseshrgovic, #garciabenn, #benedictwong.

Measured over 158 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #moseshrgovic, #garciabenn, #benedictwong.

Compared with accounts its own size

talkSPORT's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, talkSPORT sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link74% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%8.9K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 74% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026104x their median

    πŸ’­ "We have some dreams..." πŸ”΄ "We have the opportunity to win it back-to-back & that's our dream." Mikel Arteta lays out Arsenal's ambition to retain their Premier League title πŸ† https://t.co/pQfe7DjMrv

    2.9K3633325187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202627x their median

    "You don't do anything!"πŸ‘€ "You just hang around The Premier League!"😬 Jason Cundy slams Everton for just making up the numbers of The Premier League! https://t.co/BT0JaXwvZL

    5215721568213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202625x their median

    πŸ”₯ "The level of intensity sent a message." πŸ‘ "It said to me they're the team to beat this year." Stuart Pearce claims Arsenal are going to "blow the rest away" in the Premier League this season πŸ”΄ https://t.co/dhMsy3noDW

    7077416158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202621x their median

    πŸ”΄ "I think Andoni [Iraola] will land straight away." πŸ‘€ "Chelsea 3rd, City 4th, Man United 5th..." Darren Bent lays out his predictions of how the Premier League top five will finish πŸ† https://t.co/x0Q6IwtkpF

    60036236104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202620x their median

    ❌ No City or Chelsea in top four? 🀯 Brentford & Brighton in the top six? πŸ”₯ Spurs above Man United? Adrian Durham, Darren Lewis & Stuart Pearce make their first bold Premier League predictions of the season... πŸ‘€ https://t.co/4xNHU0xxTS

    510457816139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202618x their median

    ❌ "I don't like Enzo Fernandez as a player." 🀒 "His attitude stinks, he's very self-involved." 😳 "Good groups don't recruit players like him." Darren Lewis explains why Man City's midfield problems will not be resolved by signing Enzo Fernandez https://t.co/hB2UhxgzjU

    391489538178K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202617x their median

    πŸ™Œ We are so back πŸ”₯ SPORTS BAR READY FOR ANOTHER GENERATIONAL SEASON https://t.co/V7X76XTOy9

    5022112289K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202617x their median

    πŸ‘€ "Donnarumma, who I think is fairly average." πŸ† "If Pep had kept Trafford, they'd have won the Premier League." Adrian Durham doesn't hold back on his opinion on Gianluigi Donnarumma & makes a bold claim about James Trafford 🧀 https://t.co/nPKxVKiFea

    3443212131103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202616x their median

    Todd Boehly and Mark Walter in talks to sell Chelsea stakes to take value to over Β£5billion https://t.co/cth6V3Jd1X

    436362110109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202615x their median

    😳 "It was ludicrous." πŸ‘€ "If football really wants to stamp out diving, they'd say "have a two-game ban!" Stuart Pearce wasn't pleased with Riccardo Calafiori after his dive in the Community Shield https://t.co/7VeSY2Nrnx

    35636791384K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#moseshrgovic#garciabenn#benedictwong#boxing#doctorstrange

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 158 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.092% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 158 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #moseshrgovic, #garciabenn, #benedictwong.

What is talkSPORT's engagement rate on X?
talkSPORT (@talkSPORT) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 158 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,451,026 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, talkSPORT sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @talkSPORT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @talkSPORT post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going