Back to @tabataamaralsp's profile

Tabata Amaral engagement report

@tabataamaralsp - 495K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.816%
of 495K followers
Per impression
13.7%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
5.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.099%
29 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 495K followers, an engagement rate of 0.816%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 13.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tabata Amaral's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.816%, Tabata Amaral sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 362 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 19, 202613x their median

    Tomem vergonha na cara. https://t.co/uqVZEMvM9n

    41K8.9K3.7K237699K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202612x their median

    Flávio é mais perigoso que Jair. https://t.co/MuBPQdufau

    33K12K3.2K352446K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20268.9x their median

    Já liberou o sigilo, @FlavioBolsonaro?

    28K4.8K2.8K121397K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20266.8x their median

    Mas o problema é "banheiro trans", né? https://t.co/fMfafgUeLw

    22K4.6K900108339K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.8x their median

    Qual Ă© a missĂŁo de Renan Santos? https://t.co/trkbSec20F

    21K2.9K2.5K5652.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20265.8x their median

    Flávio Bolsonaro não respondeu: - Por que defendeu um acusado de matar uma criança de 5 anos - Por que votou contra o aumento da licença-maternidade - Onde estão os R$ 134 milhões que ele recebeu do Vorcaro - Se vai adotar a política econômica do Milei - Se vai voltar com a escala 6x1 - Como ele comprou tantos imóveis com o salário de senador Por que ele se recusa a falar a verdade pros brasileiros? #DebateNaBand

    16K5.9K1.2K264156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    Do que Renan Santos tem medo? https://t.co/7T4aXBY1cg

    13K1.5K1.5K3871.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.6x their median

    Afinal, quem financia as ideias de Renan Santos? https://t.co/AsxkXczdly

    11K1.5K2.0K5612.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20263.5x their median

    Não adianta impor condição, Sigiloso Master. Seja honesto com o país, pela primeira vez, e abra seu sigilo, Flávio. https://t.co/v9yaECO9yc

    8.7K2.6K2.8K114154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20262.6x their median

    MUITO GRAVE! 🚨 A Polícia Federal identificou documentos que expõem a relação entre Flávio Bolsonaro e o advogado Willer Tomaz, que o convidou para viajar em um jatinho ligado a Daniel Vorcaro, dono do Banco Master. Segundo a reportagem d'O Globo, Flávio figurava como “usuário master” de uma conta bancária da Alcazar Holdings, empresa de Willer que detinha um terço da companhia proprietária do avião. Na época, outra cotista era a Prime You, empresa da qual Vorcaro foi sócio até setembro de 2025. A investigação também identificou registros de viagens de Flávio e familiares com Willer, além de conversas entre os dois por um aplicativo que apaga o registro de todas as mensagens. A PF considera que os documentos podem indicar uma participação econômica ou societária de fato na holding. Tudo indica que Flávio não só pediu dinheiro "pro filme do pai", mas tinha negócios conectados a Vorcaro. Essa história precisa ser tirada a limpo!

    6.5K2.8K93410557K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 495K followers, an engagement rate of 0.816%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 13.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Tabata Amaral's engagement rate on X?
Tabata Amaral (@tabataamaralsp) has an engagement rate of 0.816%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 495,422 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.816%, Tabata Amaral sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tabataamaralsp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @tabataamaralsp post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going