Back to @t_adabi's profile

أدبيات engagement report

@t_adabi - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.767%
61K views on a typical post
Reach
4.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
464
interactions (median)
Saved
0.108%
66 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.43/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 464 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

أدبيات's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, أدبيات sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,148 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,016 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 11, 2018109x their median

    ”قفل أمان العالم.” https://t.co/VXfcuEnEh0

    32K17K534418View on X
  • Jun 20, 20263.3x their median

    "لا تُنفق ضوءك في مَمرٍ لا يؤمن بالشمس."

    1.2K34040103K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20263.1x their median

    "لا شيءَ أدفأُ من كلمة " أعرفُك" في موقفٍ يتطلبُ التبرير."

    1.1K34145112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    "من نوى الأذى لا يُفلحه الله ابداً، ومن كاد للعباد أُهلِك بمنكره، تلك سُنّة الله في الظالمين."

    9643797477K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20262.6x their median

    "لا أُدخلك عالمي، حتى آمنك، ولا آمنك حتى أعرض عليك ضعفي فلا تَمسه."

    8942615289K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.4x their median

    والغالب أن من تسلط على أخيه بأذية انتقم الله منه في الدنيا قبل الآخرة. - ابن عثيمين

    8482729574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    "أتمنى أن يؤجر الإنسان على رؤية وجُوه لا يودّ رؤُيتها."

    7882575178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.3x their median

    "الشخص المُجادل لا يُهزم بالحجّة بل بالتجاهل. لأن وقوده هو تفاعلك."

    8202149477K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.0x their median

    "أدين لنفسي بألف أسف.. لأني ألبستُ البعض ثوباً أوسع من حجمهم، وقدمتُ التنازلات حتى ظنّوا.. أن هدر كرامتي حقٌّ مُكتسب."

    6952203063K viewsView on X
  • Jan 4, 20261.9x their median

    صباح الخير رغم جهلي بعلم الفلك والنجوم بس كثير متداول الڤديو. انا انسان تركيزي الكامل في ما اقدم كمؤلف موسيقي واني اسوي شي يعجبكم بس استفزني الموضوع بالذات انه توقع ايجابي وبصراحه اني اسوي عمل يجمع قلوب السعوديين هذي امنيه، مع اني الحمدلله قدمت اعمال وطنيه نالت استحسانكم والكلام الايجابي يحمسني فعندي فكره لشخص تشرفت اني عرفته وكان من اعظم الناس اخلاصاً لوطنهم وقادتهم. اغنيه لروح فقيد الوطن عبدالعزيز الفغم الله يرحمه ويجمعنا فيه فجنات النعيم.

    6836413333951K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 464 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

What is أدبيات's engagement rate on X?
أدبيات (@t_adabi) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,369,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, أدبيات sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @t_adabi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @t_adabi post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going