Back to @syylcine's profile

syl🦦 engagement report

@syylcine - 131K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.84%
of 131K followers
Per impression
0.512%
987K views on a typical post
Reach
750.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.046%
452 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 5.1K interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 3.84%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 987K times each, and 0.512% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 752.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 242K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #digger, #zerovanne.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #digger, #zerovanne.

Compared with accounts its own size

syl🦦's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.84%, syl🦦 sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 104 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202648x their median

    “you can’t fix him” I don’t wanna fix him! I wanna FUCK him! I’m a pervert not a psychologist

    207K31K2313.3K3.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.1x their median

    This series made me so extremely sad. All of his victims had such futures ahead of them. This show coming out was definitely re-traumatizing for the families of those victims too. https://t.co/rfk9rt89uK

    20K5297129987K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    The academy choosing mbj over this was an abomination https://t.co/04ZnVHmBAH

    6.4K50990243872K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    RECADRER… ⚖️ https://t.co/8juCVtV0Bd

    4.8K1597714854.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    La performance d’INO CASABLANCA sur COLORS 🤯 "PA’ TOUCH" https://t.co/KkiKdPXKMj

    4.1K557513911.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    Hey mais elle cool Adèle😎👍 https://t.co/tV4daczxTX

    4.7K196441554.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Aux lycéens de France : https://t.co/BBZ7TIzcGE

    1.4K2821.5K1.0K1.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    🚨 INO CASABLANCA vient de DÉVOILER sa PERFORMANCE chez COLORS !! Le son est DINGUE, on entend notamment THEODORA dessus 🤯 https://t.co/juDGnwQAG6

    2.7K21037117497K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Nan bravo la nouvelle génération, à l’époque j’avais essayer de faire un blocus la directrice a juste dit « j’appelle les flics pour toi » j’ai dit « allez j’arrête pardon » ça a duré 10min PTDRRRR

    773234210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    On vient de m’inviter au défilé de l’Oreal sous la Tour Eiffel, je suis actuellement habillée comme un contrôleur de la RATP sous France mobilité à Gare de nord #zerovanne

    8023125K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#digger#zerovanne

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.1K interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 3.84%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 987K times each, and 0.512% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 752.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 242K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #digger, #zerovanne.

What is syl🦦's engagement rate on X?
syl🦦 (@syylcine) has an engagement rate of 3.84%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 131,156 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.84%, syl🦦 sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @syylcine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @syylcine post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going