Back to @svperfecta's profile

Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz engagement report

@svperfecta - 358K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 358K followers
Per impression
1.18%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
5.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
250
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 250 interactions against 358K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 144x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 443 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026144x their median

    I have no idea why but Grok-4.6 just totally freaked out doing some maintenance tasks when it saw my low github id. https://t.co/TGcVPR0Anl

    34K8629923105.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202620x their median

    I ditched Unreal for AI. Kaiju Engine is a completely AI written replacement. To prove it was ready for production, I tested it by recreating and porting my old game, Firefall, into Kaiju, purely from the Steam download, no source. And it worked. Real game code is messy, full of difficult details and compromises. If our engine could handle a commercially released game, it proves you can ship a game with it. We're developing 2 orders of magnitude faster (93x) by lines of code and features. We have fewer bugs, and iteration is super fast. Build times have gone from 30 mins (Unreal) to 36 seconds. Feature rate is through the roof, days instead of months. Our original engine for Firefall took 2-3 years and cost over 5M to build (adjusted). Our new engine was written in 5 months for a couple grand. We built only what we needed, with none of the Unreal bloat. And we added some features: - Modern meshlet based rendering with PBR. - Vis Buffer/Forward+ with clustered lighting. - Id Tech 5 style megatexture streaming. - Planetary sized renderer (entire solar systems possible). - Seamless flight from ground to orbit and space. - No loading screens. - Procedural planet generation with plate simulation. - Client/Server at all times. - Ozz for animation. Jolt for Physics. - Companion Blender plug-in for AI directed asset exports. - 140fps currently, 200-300 projected after optimizations. You can see Firefall's assets and levels ported over into our engine in the video. Texture resolution and pop-in are limitations of the original game (high rez CDN based textures were lost when game went offline, fog hid the original's pop-in). Our meshlet renderer will be able to do much better with LOD and already supports high rez textures. I used Grok/Codex/Claude to tag team the code. This is not just a boon for indie games, it's a real game changer for game preservation. The reaction to seeing this 10 year old discontinued game revived is very emotional for Firefall fans. But we're not just preserving Firefall, we're going beyond, creating an original game that is the spiritual successor, Em-8ER. Gliding, jumpjets... it's all coming back. Moving past Unreal let us move much faster, without the bloat, and with better performance. If you want to signup to follow news on the game, sign up is free at https://t.co/uVcBU0heLW

    4.2K27734482354K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202614x their median

    Which models can your machine actually run? Magnitude now answers that. The new model catalog: - Profiles your hardware automatically - Estimates tok/s for every model before you download - Recommends the best models for your machine Pick one and Magnitude handles the rest: - Downloads the model and quant from Hugging Face - Loads it into the built-in inference engine - Configures speculative decoding (MTP, DFlash, etc.) - Sets concurrency based on your memory Try it on your hardware: npm i -g @magnitudedev/cli

    3.2K21711129292K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202611x their median

    Bernie Sanders has written a letter to Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Mark Zuckerberg urging them to immediately pause all AI development in the interest of humanity. And he warns if they do not take appropriate action now, the US Senate will. https://t.co/xwLB0FGmF9

    1.7K225543322665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.9x their median

    BREAKING: Apple App Store sales have declined for the first time in a decade.

    1.1K614038429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.6x their median

    HR told me I couldn’t post a job for “Senior Technical Artist” because it might offend the elderly. My art lead and I thought it was a joke. It wasn’t. This is why we need an HR reset. Full video here: https://t.co/FyL2ymBd7J https://t.co/z8mb5KuQjv

    3454022323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    PUBG: DEDNET’s map size revealed during gamescom. https://t.co/U9HYdjFnPn

    7358319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    Every enterprise deal dies the same way. Everyone loves the product. Then their security team joins the call and asks one question: "Do you support SSO?" If you don't, the deal doesn't die today. It dies in three months, quietly, in a Slack channel you're not in. We got tired of watching that happen to teams building on Zernio. So today we shipped the entire auth stack: → Your buyer signs in the way they already sign into everything else → One click kills every session on every device — for the contractor who just left, or the laptop that didn't come back → Someone leaves the company, they lose access to Zernio automatically. No ticket, no forgetting → A record of who touched what, and when → Extra login protection on by default, for everyone, not locked behind a paywall Your product was never the problem. Your auth was. Not anymore.

    821312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Traveling in Japan is so great.

    701011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    One weird side effect of an agent world.. in the before times, when someone showed you something cool you were immediately curious about how they did it. Now you’re never sure if the entire thing is a sloppy hallucination.

    500011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 250 interactions against 358K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 144x its own typical post.

What is Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz's engagement rate on X?
Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz (@svperfecta) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 357,854 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Brian Corrigan l 🎮 Biz sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @svperfecta have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @svperfecta post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going