Back to @svaradarajan's profile

Siddharth engagement report

@svaradarajan - 661K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 661K followers
Per impression
1.04%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
65
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 65 interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.944% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #centralhall, #digitalarrest, #editoreel.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #centralhall, #digitalarrest, #editoreel.

Compared with accounts its own size

Siddharth's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Siddharth sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 394 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202688x their median

    Mohan Bhagwat is lying through his teeth. There were no survivors in the 1996 Charkhi Dadri collision. All 349 people aboard the two aircraft were killed, and many bodies were badly charred or mutilated. So whom exactly did his Swayamsevaks "treat"? One aircraft belonged to Saudi Arabia, while the other belonged to Kazakhstan, which is not an Arab nation. @VishnuNDTV was among the first journalists to reach the crash site and report from there. No one ever heard of these mysterious Swayamsevaks being present. Bhagwat has invented survivors, distorted facts and inserted the RSS into a tragedy, all to manufacture a certificate of communal harmony for his organisation. Even the dead are not spared from the RSS propaganda machine.

    4.1K1.4K17556191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202636x their median

    How was a matter which had been listed as per a judicial order deleted? Was it because the CJI had directed the deletion? If yes, then who moved the CJI? Did he act suo motu? Were parties heard or was only one side present? Dushyant Dvar writes CJI Surya Kant's Overreach as Master of the Roster Hurts People's Faith in the Supreme Court https://t.co/vxXBApyl5F via @thewire_In

    1.5K746451023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202630x their median

    You’ve seen those insane @BJP memes and reels? Now watch ‘Downfall’ By It's Over Bro Productions https://t.co/S7OzByhEbF

    1.4K457352793K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202615x their median

    “The debate is no longer about whether to believe or dismiss Rahul Gandhi. The issue is whether every Indian citizen’s vote will be counted and used to elect the government of their choice, or whether the ruling party will be allowed to manipulate the process to remain in power at both the Centre and the state level.” Remarkable piece by @MehboobaMufti, perhaps the first of its kind in Indian politics, where the leader of one political party, @jkpdp, sets aside differences and rivalries to appreciate what the leader of another, @RahulGandhi, has been saying about the future of democracy as a whole. https://t.co/2u0t1U8ooq via @thewire_In

    67925415415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202614x their median

    When Mohan Bhagwat says that ‘if any Hindu thinks that there should be no Muslims in Bharat, he will not remain Hindu’, what he leaves unsaid is the question of equal status. Hindutva ideologies like Golwalkar and Savarkar also never spoke of a ‘Muslim free India’ but of an India where Muslims could remain provided they knew their place as second-class citizens. Today Bhagwat is not speaking about Hindus and Muslims in some abstract or ideological sense. He is speaking to an India and a world that has seen active discrimination and violence against Muslims over the past decade. Bhagwat wants us to be oblivious to the reality of what the RSS-BJP government has been doing to make the lives of Muslims unbearable.

    603213661423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202610x their median

    Political memes work when there is humour and parody, subtlety and sarcasm. The BJP is clueless about this and is doing what it knows best, which is making a “joke” out of people being shot or slapped in a classroom or getting assaulted in a police station. The ‘joke’ doesn’t work simply because you label the victim ‘dimaghi naxal’. I wonder if @narendramodi and @amitshah and the duffers running their party IT cell would think this ‘ad’ is funny. If they do, please feel free to use it :

    465150301118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.5x their median

    Four Ways in Which the BAPS Disaster, Trying to Keep Women Away from Eiffel Tower, Hurts Modi, BJP and India 1. BAPS is tied closely to Modi’s political brand abroad 2. This has happened in the heart of Europe, in Paris 3. Indian diplomats have been promoting BAPS 4. BAPS has exposed conservative Indian opinion Read on! https://t.co/mU8v6k3PiZ via @thewire_In

    29211020214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.2x their median

    Colonel (R) Rajesh Kalia, who retired from the Indian Army in January 2025, writes of how a lifetime of protecting India is outweighed by @ECISVEEP’s demand that he provide his identity via the #SIR : “Anyone can be born in India. But it takes a special kind of endurance to survive the ultimate test of belonging initiated by the Election Commission of India (ECI). For those who have never faced this bureaucratic machinery, the grand interrogation is not a standard background check, it’s a deep-dive into your entire existence, requiring a level of ancestral detail that makes a top-secret military clearance look like a casual chat.” https://t.co/g0pgN43ifp via @thewire_In

    203126449.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.6x their median

    Politic | Mohan Bhagwat's Sermons in the US are Nothing But Hypocrisy and Deception https://t.co/FsL1cTehiz via @thewire_In

    198732148.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.5x their median

    The government usually prefers to ignore critical reports of its performance (or even go all vengeful) but our story on the recent paper by Profs Robin and Kevin Grier went viral and I guess the higher-ups thought they should not let this go unchallenged. The Griers’ was a robust probing of the question of where India would be if Modi had not become PM in 2014 and done what he did. Their answer, based on analysis of data, was that Modi has made India worse off than what it might have been had he not been in power. Well, Senior Advisor, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting @KanchanGupta sent in a brief rejoinder of sorts which we have run, along with the Griers’ response. We will all have our own view of who comes out better and I will let readers decide that for themselves but I am thrilled this debate is the most read piece on The Wire today. https://t.co/DS2m3pjIIO via @thewire_In

    201893117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#centralhall#digitalarrest#editoreel#sahilwakode#venicefilmfestival

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 65 interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.944% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #centralhall, #digitalarrest, #editoreel.

What is Siddharth's engagement rate on X?
Siddharth (@svaradarajan) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 660,679 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Siddharth sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @svaradarajan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @svaradarajan post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going