Back to @susannasilfver's profile

Susanna Silfverskiöld engagement report

@susannasilfver - 73K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.36%
of 73K followers
Per impression
6.04%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
39.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 2.36%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 6.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Susanna Silfverskiöld's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.36%, Susanna Silfverskiöld sits above the 75th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.672% to 2.54%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,259 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 20262.3x their median

    Nu lovar Magdalena Andersson att stoppa införandet av bidragstaket om hon blir statsminister. Hon ska se till att man ska fortsätta kunna tjäna mer pengar på att leva på bidrag än på att gå till jobbet. Då var det klart. S är inte längre ett arbetarparti, utan ett bidragsparti.

    3.3K589732038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.0x their median

    Flera mätningar har visat att stödet för Socialdemokraterna faller kraftig. Och nu kan SVT visa att även väljarnas förtroende för Magdalena Andersson rasar. Detta med bara fyra dagar kvar tills vallokalerna stänger. Sprid glädjen vidare! https://t.co/DmbtZNNd4U

    2.9K508411636K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    Som av en händelse blev Nooshi Dadgostar i sista sekund sjuk när hon skulle möta statsministern i debatt, dagen efter nya avslöjanden från Expressen om vänsterpartister som hyllar diktatorer, terrorister och hatar homosexuella. Mycket lägligt, Nooshi. Mycket lägligt. https://t.co/rACLHDWJnO

    2.7K363711471K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    Influencern som sagt att hon blivit erbjuden 150 000 kr för ett inlägg på Instagram där hon skulle prata om varför man borde rösta på Socialdemokraterna, har nu postat detta. Lyssna på vad hon säger och läs smsen hon uppvisar. Det väcker frågor om Socialdemokraternas metoder. https://t.co/CyWo05VtNe

    2.4K392611768K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.5x their median

    Nytt avslöjande från GP imorse. Nu har skandalerna inom Vänsterpartiet tagit sig ända upp till partiledarnivå. Nooshi Dadgostar hade möte i riksdagen med politiker från Fatahs revolutionära råd som har uttryckt hat mot judar och hyllat terrorism. Någonstans måste gränsen gå. https://t.co/A8tVq1Eog2

    2.2K392451242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    Bra i TV4: Som statsminister hade Magdalena Andersson en städare i sitt hem som saknade rätt att befinna sig i Sverige och var efterlyst med avvisningsbeslut – och som städade svart. Och så lurade Socialdemokraterna dementa äldre att köpa lotter för att få pengar till partiet. https://t.co/0FASCrBF2u

    2.2K357501785K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Magdalena Andersson vs. Ulf Kristersson. Varsågod att välja din statsminister. https://t.co/kip4cpRKuf

    2.1K2407215108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Häromdagen avslöjades Socialdemokraterna med att posta tiktok med dömda gängkriminella för att locka väljare. Ena hade misshandlat sin flickvän. Och här ser ni hur en dömd kriminell rappare - Alex Ceesay – uppmanar alla att rösta på S, V eller MP. Någonstans finns ett mönster. https://t.co/9dmyraHDEy

    1.9K372952671K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    I Sveriges Radio vägrar nu Magdalena Andersson svara på om det är fel att släppa in Vänsterpartiet i regeringen. Det är alltså två veckor till valet och hon vägrar berätta för väljarna vilka politiker hon tänker ge makten. Svenska folket förtjänar att veta, Magdalena Andersson.

    1.8K251501019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Ännu ett exempel på när Socialdemokraterna håller valmöte där män och kvinnor är könsseparerade. Senast var det i Uppsala. Den här gången i Nyköping. Det är nästan som att S är redo att sälja ut exakt allt – inklusive kvinnors rättigheter – för att få makt. De borde skämmas. https://t.co/9MItSQNARc

    1.6K392682924K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 2.36%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 6.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 38.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

What is Susanna Silfverskiöld's engagement rate on X?
Susanna Silfverskiöld (@susannasilfver) has an engagement rate of 2.36%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 73,372 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.36%, Susanna Silfverskiöld sits above the 75th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @susannasilfver have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @susannasilfver post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going