Back to @sunyuchentron's profile

孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀 engagement report

@sunyuchentron - 673K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 673K followers
Per impression
0.068%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
6.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
30
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 673K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.068% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1533x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tron, #孙宇晨奖, #token2049.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #tron, #孙宇晨奖, #token2049.

Compared with accounts its own size

孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, 孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20261533x their median

    我的女友景甜   一颗卵子的重量,三点五微克。 五千万美元现金的重量,两点五吨。 景甜在蒙太奇拉古纳海滩的电话里向我要的是后者,抵押的是前者。 她去那里是为了取卵。代孕的孩子预计2027年出生,快一点的话还能属马。这是她主动提的。到了诊所,她说没有五千万,不取。   蒙太奇拉古纳海滩在海崖上,底下是太平洋。那一层包下来,三十天,一百万美元,为了她的隐私。她住了八天就走了。 剩下的二十二天,酒店的清洁工每天照常上去。是我的助理讲的,她去交钥匙的时候撞见过一次:一个墨西哥女人推着车,一间一间进,换毛巾,擦台面,把被角掖好,退出来把门带上。做完一整层,两个小时。 助理问她,没人住,为什么还要做。 她说,登记上写着有人。 一座失去皇后的凡尔赛宫。 我突然意识到,景甜喜欢这个。景甜喜欢一个地方因为她而空着。什么都不发生。 与蒙太奇拉古纳海滩一起空置的,还有一架湾流G700尴尬地停在Van Nuys,机组每天照常报到。 第八天她打了那个电话。之后没有人再见过她。   ---   2007年,已经有人替她烧钱了。那年我刚进北大。 当然,烧钱的不是我。 QQ弹出一个窗口,代言人是她。就在那台联想IBM的老机器上,分辨率糊得很。我把图片存下来了。 我在一年房租一千块的北大宿舍上网,在校内网上找到她,发了好友申请。校内网要填一句留言,我写了删,删了写,弄了大概四十分钟,最后发出去一句“你好”。 她没有通过。 她也许根本没用过校内网。 后来这些年,我做每一件事的时候都在想一个问题:到了什么程度,她会通过。第一个十亿的时候我想过,一百亿的时候我想过。 后来我不想了。人人网早就倒闭了。 我没有再申请第二次。 2011年,北京冷。我买了一件羽绒服,一百五十块。我记得这个价格,因为我犹豫了三天。 同一年她拍了一部一亿五千万的电影《战国》。孙红雷、吴镇宇、金喜善、中井贵一、姜武就像十九年后的蒙太奇拉古纳海滩与湾流G700一样被请来做了陪衬,他们不知道自己为什么出现在这里,来都来了,总得发生些什么,但是什么都没有发生。 再后来是一亿五千万美元的《长城》。张艺谋,刘德华,马特·达蒙。再后来是成龙。景甜宇宙的名单越来越长。 我那时已经在美国了,读书,创业,越来越忙。唯一没变的是,每换一台设备,无论多麻烦,我都把那张QQ图片导过去。 十九年后,名单上加了我。   ---   瑰丽酒店我们见了第一面。我一直以为见到她那天我会紧张。 我没有。 她比照片上瘦,穿得很随意,靠在沙发上。我看着她,忽然想不起来我等的到底是什么。 我带她去看卡特兰的香蕉。她看了很久,问我,这个多少钱。 六百二十万美元。 她说,那它烂了怎么办。 我沉默了。她说,不管了,我们去看电影吧。 我说好。 她说放映厅里除了我们两个,不能有任何人。 我说好。 我出去打了个电话。回来的时候她还站在那根香蕉前面。 那部电影是《疯狂动物城2》。 两个人的放映厅,这种场景一般用于中宣部审片。 我让助理把电影院所有的座位都买下来。 我看过批判刷假票房的文章,说票买光了只有两个人看。现在我明白了,也许不全是为了票房。 把座位全买下来不难,麻烦的是已经卖出去的票。助理和保镖提前到影院门口,遇到买了票的观众,把现金递过去。 一对带孩子的夫妻来了,孩子已经在门口高高举着爆米花。 助理递上一沓钱,孩子不懂为什么不能进去,大人接过钱,道谢,什么也没问,走了。 那天领钱的有二十六个人。 看完她把微信头像换成了朱迪警官。 晚上我用手揉她的奶子,被她推开了。 我以为她不愿意。我把手收回来,准备说点什么。 她没说话。她坐起来,从包里翻出一个小袋子,拉开,里面一排东西,像一套很小的工具。 她说,你的指甲扎得我痛。 我看了一眼。我一直是拿指甲刀随便剪两下,边上是尖的,平时不觉得。 她说,过来。 她把我的手放在她腿上,一根一根磨。 先是粗的那一面,磨完换一面,再换一面。磨一会儿举起来对着灯看看,再接着磨。 我说这个要磨多久。 她说,磨到不刮人为止。 十个手指,她花了快一个小时。 中间她教我,这一面磨形状,这一面抛光,最后一面不要来回蹭,要顺着一个方向。 我说好。 磨完她把我的手翻过来看了看,摸了一下。 她说,行了。 摸吧,想摸哪都行。 中间她说过一句话。她说,要是以后我不在了,就再没有人给你抛指甲了。 我笑了一下,没说话。 认识她三个月的时候,我让人做了一份东西。她那些年的项目、合作方、公司股权、景国庆,田心爱,所有的几个关联账户,北京租的房,上海买的房,还有一些别的。一周就做完了,一共四十几页。还有些男男女女的事情,我觉得这是最不重要的。 里面有一些事她后来跟我讲过,讲的和上面写的不太一样。我没有说。 有一些事她一直没讲。我也没有问。 我全部相信她说的。 那份东西我留着,一直留到现在。 但是我一个字也不信。   ---

    34K2.3K8.5K1.3K16M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026191x their median

    《再致胡锡进老师——什么才是体面》 胡锡进老师: 上次给您写信,是向您请教彩礼的规矩。这次想请教一件更大的事。 您的三篇文章,我都读了许多遍。您批评我不体面。这些天我反复想的,不是怎么回答您,而是慢慢发现:我真正不清楚的,是您说的体面和我说的体面,是不是同一个东西。 什么才是真正的体面? 您是长辈,一九六零年生人,比我刚好大三十岁。您那一代人的体面,我在父辈身上见过。无法可依的年代,两个人做成一件事,靠的是一句话、一杯酒、一个愿意作保的人。作保的人拿什么保?拿他一辈子的名声、位置、关系。 我小时候见过一位这样的长者:别人几年要不回的账,他一顿饭要了回来;两家人几乎反目,他各打五十大板,两边都服。他一生没有签过几份合同,但他说过的话,没有一句落过空。那个年代的体面是有重量的,这是那个时代资源分配的规则。我的父辈受过这种体面的恩惠。这份功劳,我认,而且记着。 我是一九九零年生人。我们这代人是在另一种东西里长大的:计算机、算法、合同、法律、白纸黑字。它冷,冷得常常让您那一代觉得无情。但当我抚摸着这些冰冷不近人情的东西,那时我隐约觉得,最大的体面,也许是不用讲体面。 我们这代人做的事,是试着把饭桌上的事情,搬进法律,搬进代码,搬进人工智能。 两代人各有一套体面,也各有一本账。我想把我想不清楚的三个问题写下来。这三个问题不是问您的,也不是问我自己的,是想把它们放到桌面上,问给下一个三十年的中国年青人。 第一问:一个人受了损害,被夺走了钱、尊严、时间,是消化它体面,还是主张它体面? 您那一代的答案是消化,咽回去。打掉牙往肚里咽,在那个年代不是懦弱,几乎是成年礼,委屈没有去处,消化就是仅有的尊严。而且你们真诚地相信,不计较是一种修养,即便内耗到难以复加。我见过这种修养最好的样子:一位老人吃了大亏,一生不提,把气力都用在往前过日子上,儿孙满堂的时候,谁也看不出他缺过什么,只是谁也没见过他深夜辗转的样子。他不是不知道自己有理,而是不相信有理有用。 我这一代的答案是主张,说出来。不是我们脾气大,是委屈第一次有了去处:什么算数、什么不算数,越来越多地写在了纸上。受了损害去立案,在我们看来不是撕破脸,是把脸交给规则去评,交给公众去评。每个人也第一次有了自己的讲台,只是讲台上说的话,同样要经得起规则的称量。 消化有消化的尊严,主张有主张的代价。哪一种更体面,我不确定。 第二问:人和人做事,彼此之间相信道德交情,还是相信合同与算法? 道德与交情的好处,我不敢小看。它快,它暖,它在规则够不着的地方依然有效,今天中国的许多事,仍然是交情在办,而且办得不坏。一个人愿意以道德为另一个人作保,这件事本身,任何时代都值得敬重。 合同与算法的好处是另一种:它让互不相识的人可以合作,让没有引荐的年青人有一张入场券,让信用离开具体的人也能存在。交情护得住熟人,护不住陌生人;合同认得了条款,认不了难处。 而我们这代人真实的处境,是站在两套办法的中间: 合同签了,还是要吃饭;道理占了,还是要找人。这中间的路要走多久、怎么走,我不确定。 但是我有预感: 年青人往后要去的地方,越来越多是没有熟人的地方,新的城市,新的行业,新的国家。在没有熟人的地方,面子是带不走的,能带走的只有合同和算法。它们不认人,所以认所有人。 我做的东西,绝大多数使用它的人不认识我,也不需要相信我的人品,他们只需要相信规则本身。这件事教育了我。

    4.1K1721.3K117853K viewsView on X
  • Mar 28, 2025160x their median

    从怀揣梦想的创业者到成为具备全球影响力的带头人,很荣幸被《福布斯》评为“加密领域的亿万富翁领航者”。波场TRON的征程仍在继续,我们将持续构建服务3亿用户的全球支付系统,并不断扩大用户规模。去中心化终将胜利! https://t.co/ocEKFXM1EO

    2.5K2282.0K574.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202689x their median

    鉴于全网对我身高的争议已持续多日,本人现公开招标一家权威计量机构对本人身高进行测量。要求:精度毫米级,结果可溯源至国际标准,全程直播。各类权威人士与机构等均可报名。

    1.7K34880741.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202517x their median

    我的太空vlog 刚刚从太空回来,已经坐在办公室了,眼睛盯着电脑屏幕,但脑子里却时不时浮现出太空的画面,刚刚收到了这段我在太空的自拍分享给大家。 我知道我还会再回去的,下一次,再高一点,再远一点。 https://t.co/DIYbQzcLOJ

    1.1K9133615838K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202653x their median

    这段时间,关于我和我们团队的各种说法很多。我不打算逐条回应。 我想说的是另一件事: 我对我们从事的事业抱有绝对的信心。这种信心不来自我本人,而来自数学、密码学和人工智能本身已经取得的突破。这些突破一旦发生就不可逆转,不以任何人、任何机构的意志为转移。 过去十几年,这个行业经历过无数次"这次真的结束了"。每一次,技术都在噪音散去之后继续向前。政策会变,舆论会变,而数学不会。地球上的八十亿人,最终都会直接或间接地使用建立在这些技术之上的服务。 我们的使命从未改变:让这些服务足够可靠、足够完善,以至于当那一天到来时,人们选择的是我们。 我在这里,一直在这里,永远在这里。

    7943172329639K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202644x their median

    比特币正在成为一种全球宏观资产,稳定币也正加速融入日常金融体系。 波场TRON将持续建设支撑数字美元全球流通的基础设施。 很高兴在 @Bitcoinconfasia 与大家深入交流。🇭🇰 https://t.co/DOftGNkbxk

    65716618191.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202643x their median

    最近有人关心我有多少钱? 我个人有多少钱,从来不是这个行业该关心的问题,我也不打算拿它来回应任何人。 加密行业跟传统金融最根本的区别,就是它不需要你相信某一个人——账本是开着的,谁都可以查。 所以我只说可以查的东西,数字截至今天: 火币的储备金证明(PoR),我们已经坚持了数年,定期公开,第三方可验证,用户资产始终1:1足额对应,每一笔都在链上。 波场链上流转的USDT超过940亿美元,每天在全球各个角落自由结算,任何一个区块浏览器实时可见。 WBTC链上储备90亿美元,一比一锚定比特币,托管地址公开。 USDD流通15亿美元,抵押情况链上可验,随存随提。 这些不是我说的,是链说的。谁都可以在任何时间打开区块浏览器,自己核对。 我做这个行业的原则从第一天起没有变过:扎根互联网,让用户秒充秒提,因为那是他们的钱,也是他们的自由。这份自由是我进入这个行业的原因,也是我最热爱的东西。 至于我本人,很好,谢谢关心。

    8691537520920K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202641x their median

    孙宇晨奖 首期66个获奖数学问题正式公布 面向全球数学研究者 奖励重要数学问题上的突破性成果 66 Problems. One Frontier. 向未知发起挑战 https://t.co/GPiDjp7fC1

    8024832244553K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202636x their median

    创业十四年,我个人的绝大多数资产一直是加密资产。这不是疏忽,是选择。我做这个行业,就是因为我相信它是人类金融资产里最有希望的那一类——这个判断可能对也可能错,时间会给答案。 但如果你真的相信一个东西,"套现"这个词本身就说不通。2012年的特斯拉,早年的比特币,2016年的英伟达,2024年的存储芯片,真正拿住的人,从来不是靠"及时套现"赢的,而是靠不套现。有人一直建议我把加密资产换成房子、股票、现金,我理解这种好意,但我无法理解这种逻辑:如果我已经持有我认为最好的资产,换成次好的意义是什么? 我不劝任何人这么做,这是我的判断,风险我自己承担。但我不打算改。

    8013024314370K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tron#孙宇晨奖#token2049#usdd

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 673K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 0.068% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1533x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tron, #孙宇晨奖, #token2049.

What is 孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀's engagement rate on X?
孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀 (@sunyuchentron) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 672,950 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, 孙宇晨(去过太空版)🧑‍🚀 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sunyuchentron have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sunyuchentron post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going