Back to @sum109's profile

Sue Diamond engagement report

@sum109 - 134K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 134K followers
Per impression
3.61%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
66
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 3.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #ubcupdates.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sue Diamond's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Sue Diamond sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 285 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 202630x their median

    It is astonishing how effortless the path to “wealth” now appears. 🥂 In today’s online fundraising drive, Ugandans have contributed around 26 million UGX to Bruno K, expressing their gratitude for his kindness & the support he has shown to many. https://t.co/OXtOkl5Pan

    1.9K4620297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.8x their median

    Mission 29 September đź‘‘ Pink has gone with the bitter ladies! https://t.co/7vw49UNceU

    1501224011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.4x their median

    Tooro Kingdom. Mission: 29 September, the crowning of Prince Edward Rukidi Kijanangoma đź‘‘ Let this be the first image that greets you each morning and the last that steadies you each night. https://t.co/UHvo2lQNoM

    123241133.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.3x their median

    Prince Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I, will be formally coronated 👑 on 29 September at Karuziika Palace in Fort Portal. This historic occasion marks the continuation of Tooro’s royal lineage and reaffirms the cultural stewardship entrusted to the Kingdom. The ceremony stands as a significant moment of renewal, unity and institutional continuity for all who honour and uphold Tooro’s heritage.

    118171603.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.0x their median

    This message is directed to all those who remain unclear about how the Tooro Kingdom succession matter was ultimately resolved. You should recall that General Tumukunde was drawn into various meetings where the Queen Mother’s team attempted to mislead him with demands to install a hidden child as the heir to the throne, based on a purported Will as justification. It is essential to understand that the final decision was anchored in cultural guidance. As General Tumukunde himself stated: “If I did not have the guidance of Omusuuga, maybe I could have made several mistakes.” This is precisely a testimony that the succession decision was made through proper cultural protocol. The succession matter was resolved through the proper channels, guided by Omusuuga’s counsel and the historical succession framework. However, General Tumukunde has recommended establishing a clear record of cultural protocols so that institutions have well‑documented references when making decisions. He also emphasised that cultural institutions must build independent capacity to run their affairs, urging leaders to organise themselves to ensure these institutions are truly independent. It must be clearly understood that King Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I was not elected; he was identified through the Royal succession line, in accordance with tradition and the established order of the Babiito dynasty. Long live our King 👑

    114165014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.0x their median

    I will no longer engage in arguments with Team Baby Oyo however, I will ensure that 29 September is not forgotten. đź‘‘ Banange, temutuloga! Meanwhile, fundraising of Shs925 million is underway to successfully run the Empango. https://t.co/Ietwvne911

    11381402.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.9x their median

    Official portrait of the Omukama Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I Mission 29 September, Crowning of the new King of Tooro đź‘‘ https://t.co/8C5D3cNXbg

    10812802.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.7x their median

    Meet, Tooro Kingdom's new beautiful, cultured Queen Mother. Goal is to protect and preserve culture norms. Mission 29 September. The crowning of Prince Edward Rukidi I đź‘‘ https://t.co/nIwhfQZeHw

    7892133.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.5x their median

    My King Edward Rukidi Nyabongo I đź‘‘ https://t.co/TdPDmsyscy

    874901.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Protecting Heritage vs Protecting a Guinness World Record As you persist in defending the Guinness World Record legacy of the youngest reigning King, while deliberately keeping the potential successor out of sight under the pretext of safeguarding the late King Oyo’s memory, we remain firmly committed to raising 500 million UGX for Omusuuga. Have you contributed yet? Your contribution is the clearest measure of respect for our culture and for those who work tirelessly to preserve it.

    636803.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ubcupdates

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 3.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is Sue Diamond's engagement rate on X?
Sue Diamond (@sum109) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,265 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Sue Diamond sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sum109 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sum109 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going