Back to @sujing110's profile

一枝独秀SJ/苏静 engagement report

@sujing110 - 295K followers on X

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 295K followers
Per impression
0.566%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
55
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 295K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.566% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 146x its own typical post.

Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

一枝独秀SJ/苏静's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, 一枝独秀SJ/苏静 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 2026146x their median

    https://t.co/ZEWreWcDB0

    7.2K670123461.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026121x their median

    Hangi elleri daha çekici buluyorsunuz? Tombik mi yoksa damarlı mı? https://t.co/NFDLGqVuTC

    5.6K896942652.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.9x their median

    陈翔六点半:初听不知曲中意,再听已是曲中人When I first heard the song, I didn't understand its meaning; when I heard it again, I had already become the person in the song. https://t.co/lcpfoWWEh3

    3582646540K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.6x their median

    哈哈哈 。 而且 第一次见面 孙宇晨不可能没有表示。 https://t.co/5NvrOjyKHX

    206840028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.7x their median

    单依纯这件衣服是我见过最能暴露缺点的衣服了! 一点胸都没了! https://t.co/g1Puk909Ub

    128867276K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    出门采购发货了。 红牛胶囊 护肝片 袋鼠精 黄色胶囊 红管 复合维生素 鱼油等…… 都需要给国内补货了☺️☺️☺️ https://t.co/duDlMbmsa7

    6419009.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.7x their median

    哈哈哈 这个英文,我听了好多遍 评论太好玩了。 https://t.co/b4Y3WNOHJ6

    73371156K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.6x their median

    晚安。 https://t.co/kw5O0wMXEC

    10833309.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    哈哈哈 我老公不想钱也不喝酒,只有一点对。 我想钱不喝酒,两点对。 你们符合几点? https://t.co/wuc1uzhVbJ

    48672216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.3x their median

    木子美在燕郊买房 很多人都知道 我们在2008年也在燕郊买了房 当时喜欢北京星河湾的建筑样式 买不起 就在燕郊买了纳丹堡 据说和星河湾是一个设计师 在燕郊住的那几年 深知去北京有多麻烦 尤其我还上过一个月班 坐公交938应该 披星戴月了一个月了 放弃了 那些年河北北京雾霾好严重 娃也面临小学毕业 总觉得要给娃一个好的环境 于是 2013年到了澳大利亚 燕郊的房子就空着 总觉得要给自己留一条后路 万一回去 得有地方住 空了9年 2022年我们卖了 当时看卖便宜了 现在看就是赚了 但对燕郊 还是有些感情的 尤其潮白河畔 曾经是我和徐说老了一定每天要散步看夕阳的地方

    69551015K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 55 interactions against 295K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.566% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 146x its own typical post.

What is 一枝独秀SJ/苏静's engagement rate on X?
一枝独秀SJ/苏静 (@sujing110) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 294,667 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, 一枝独秀SJ/苏静 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sujing110 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sujing110 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going