Back to @submit_site's profile

Web Directory engagement report

@submit_site - 84K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 84K followers
Per impression
0.752%
133 views on a typical post
Reach
0.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 133 times each, and 0.752% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 54% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Web Directory's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Web Directory sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,175 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 252 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 29, 20265.0x their median

    Get featured on one of our directories — https://t.co/BNvkB4UWmy, https://t.co/ua721yJ0ZT, or https://t.co/LuQvB4Yovq — and we’ll share your site on our X account for free!

    50001.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.0x their median

    Schema markup owners see a 40% higher CTR in search results. But in 2026, that's just the start. Websites with schema also get a 30% visibility boost in AI systems. Still skipping structured data on your key pages? Link in reply.

    2010155 viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    Your keywords are like a radar system for your business. One B2B SaaS client we worked with saw 68% organic traffic growth in 9 months just by monitoring the right terms. Are you tracking which keywords actually convert, or guessing in the dark? @StartGrowthHack Link in the reply.

    0030110 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.0x their median

    Nearly 80% of top three results shifted in the March 2026 core update. Most recoveries came from fixing content quality gaps, not template tweaks. Your site needs clear value and stable technical health to hold rankings now. https://t.co/JxrQQLGQ9m, algorithm, update, 2026/ Details in link.

    1020126 viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.0x their median

    2 billion people check Facebook daily. That's massive reach for your business, but here's what matters more: 71% use it to message friends and family. Your audience is there, but they're not scrolling ads. They're connecting. How are you fitting into their conversations? @bloggingwizard Link in the reply.

    1010129 viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.0x their median

    Google's March and May 2026 core updates pivoted on a single metric: Information Gain. Pages that added original insight beat those that just reorganized existing data. https://t.co/XZIDq3y5pO, april, 2026, algorithm, updates/ Link in reply.

    1010110 viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.0x their median

    Most teams still treat SEO as a backend website problem. It isn't. Your brand visibility now depends on how you show up across Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, podcasts, and social platforms. Search is everywhere. Is your content strategy there too?

    1010177 viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.0x their median

    Core Web Vitals still matter. AI Overviews matter now too. But here's what kills most sites during updates: they chase ranking factors instead of asking whether their pages earn trust. Authority isn't gamed. It's built. Link below.

    101083 viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    Q3 2026 is historically the most volatile update window. Industry expects the next major core update August, September based on the 3, 4 month cadence. Build content quality and technical performance now, not after rankings drop. Proactive beats reactive every time. Link in reply.

    1010166 viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    Google's June update targeted scaled content abuse, expired domain abuse, and unnatural link schemes. If you're building real value instead of exploiting ranking loopholes, your site likely stayed stable. What tactics are you moving away from? https://t.co/5O0OKx5BIq, algorithm, updates, 2026/

    002080 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 133 times each, and 0.752% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 54% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Web Directory's engagement rate on X?
Web Directory (@submit_site) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 83,631 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Web Directory sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @submit_site have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @submit_site post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going