Web Directory engagement report
@submit_site - 84K followers on X
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 133 times each, and 0.752% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 54% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Web Directory's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Web Directory sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 252 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 29, 20265.0x their median
Get featured on one of our directories — https://t.co/BNvkB4UWmy, https://t.co/ua721yJ0ZT, or https://t.co/LuQvB4Yovq — and we’ll share your site on our X account for free!
- Sep 29, 20263.0x their median
Schema markup owners see a 40% higher CTR in search results. But in 2026, that's just the start. Websites with schema also get a 30% visibility boost in AI systems. Still skipping structured data on your key pages? Link in reply.
- Aug 31, 20263.0x their median
Your keywords are like a radar system for your business. One B2B SaaS client we worked with saw 68% organic traffic growth in 9 months just by monitoring the right terms. Are you tracking which keywords actually convert, or guessing in the dark? @StartGrowthHack Link in the reply.
- Aug 30, 20263.0x their median
Nearly 80% of top three results shifted in the March 2026 core update. Most recoveries came from fixing content quality gaps, not template tweaks. Your site needs clear value and stable technical health to hold rankings now. https://t.co/JxrQQLGQ9m, algorithm, update, 2026/ Details in link.
- Oct 2, 20262.0x their median
2 billion people check Facebook daily. That's massive reach for your business, but here's what matters more: 71% use it to message friends and family. Your audience is there, but they're not scrolling ads. They're connecting. How are you fitting into their conversations? @bloggingwizard Link in the reply.
- Oct 1, 20262.0x their median
Google's March and May 2026 core updates pivoted on a single metric: Information Gain. Pages that added original insight beat those that just reorganized existing data. https://t.co/XZIDq3y5pO, april, 2026, algorithm, updates/ Link in reply.
- Sep 30, 20262.0x their median
Most teams still treat SEO as a backend website problem. It isn't. Your brand visibility now depends on how you show up across Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, podcasts, and social platforms. Search is everywhere. Is your content strategy there too?
- Sep 30, 20262.0x their median
Core Web Vitals still matter. AI Overviews matter now too. But here's what kills most sites during updates: they chase ranking factors instead of asking whether their pages earn trust. Authority isn't gamed. It's built. Link below.
- Sep 1, 20262.0x their median
Q3 2026 is historically the most volatile update window. Industry expects the next major core update August, September based on the 3, 4 month cadence. Build content quality and technical performance now, not after rankings drop. Proactive beats reactive every time. Link in reply.
- Sep 1, 20262.0x their median
Google's June update targeted scaled content abuse, expired domain abuse, and unnatural link schemes. If you're building real value instead of exploiting ranking loopholes, your site likely stayed stable. What tactics are you moving away from? https://t.co/5O0OKx5BIq, algorithm, updates, 2026/
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 133 times each, and 0.752% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 54% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.
- What is Web Directory's engagement rate on X?
- Web Directory (@submit_site) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 83,631 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Web Directory sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @submit_site have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @submit_site post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.