Back to @stylebender's profile

Israel Adesanya engagement report

@stylebender - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.276%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.805%
631K views on a typical post
Reach
34.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.11%
694 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 5.1K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Posts are seen about 631K times each, and 0.805% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 800K interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.276%, Israel Adesanya sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 173 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 27, 2026

    Thank You Africa🌍❤️ I Will be back.✊🏽 https://t.co/tCIRAO5MeB

    736K53K8.0K3.1K27M viewsView on X
  • Jan 31, 2026

    🇺🇸 INSANE: “THEY ATE HUMAN FLESH” What the 21-year-old Gabriela Rico Jimenez claimed hysterically is now collaborate by the Epstein files! She disappeared that night forever. Who disappeared her? https://t.co/FVDohpE3YT

    220K37K1.4K1.6K22M viewsView on X
  • Nov 12, 2025

    She’s a menace 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/HWE3xUUdDp

    168K14K1724191.5M viewsView on X
  • Jan 15, 2026

    Who is this guy? This is the fucking energy we need. LFG https://t.co/5VchiVkLoh

    132K26K3.8K2.1K5.7M viewsView on X
  • Dec 31, 2025

    Jackie Chan speaking about the children of Gaza 💔 https://t.co/Kg7Dp1KMrG

    114K31K3054143.3M viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 2026

    🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Epstein survivors just announced they will release their own list of names. “We know who abused us. We saw who came and went. This list will be survivor-led-for survivors.” Let’s make this go viral ☝️ https://t.co/k2kYat5cPF

    91K28K2.3K7672.0M viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 2026

    You'll never see a higher level striking fight than this 🔥 Izzy’s chin is unreal. Alex landed bombs, and we all know his power. #UFCSeattle #MMATwitter https://t.co/uM8V5yo9nI

    77K7.7K8084211.3M viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 2025

    Michael Jordan: "I'm pretty sure I'm part of the reason why everybody tries to get a logo…But the thing is, that brand was established based on what I did on the basketball court. I didn't put the brand before I put the work." (h/t @fsh733) https://t.co/CrBKOKXc4I

    76K7.5K5406634.9M viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 2026

    The entire World owes him an apology. RIP Michael. https://t.co/8fLxbShpG9

    69K12K8763361.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 9, 2026

    Dubai billionaire explains why taxes are dumb. “You’re basically working 5 months for free” Dubai has no taxes. https://t.co/zORlmPovVo

    63K8.4K99491510M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.1K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.276%. Posts are seen about 631K times each, and 0.805% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 800K interactions. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Israel Adesanya's engagement rate on X?
Israel Adesanya (@stylebender) has an engagement rate of 0.276%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,841,697 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.276%, Israel Adesanya sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @stylebender have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @stylebender post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going