Back to @stocktalkweekly's profile

Stock Talk engagement report

@stocktalkweekly - 400K followers on X

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 400K followers
Per impression
0.679%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
11.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
321
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 321 interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.679% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Stock Talk's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, Stock Talk sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 20268.0x their median

    *BANK OF AMERICA VICE PRESIDENT KILLED IN TARGETED STABBING IN TIMES SQUARE - BLOOMBERG

    2.3K13111164512K viewsView on X
  • Dec 31, 20256.0x their median

    FINAL 2025 FULL-YEAR PERFORMANCE +505.20% vs. +17.25% for S&P-500 Truly life-changing year for me. Full portfolio transparency the entire way shared with thousands of members. No meme stocks and no 0DTE options. Just deep-research on themes & industries. Proud & humbled. https://t.co/cd1YlSvbCB

    1.7K8717919642K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.8x their median

    Me and @jimcramer on the NYSE floor https://t.co/H2rbatLkhr

    1.4K14134189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    One of the most prominent public protests against datacenters is that they are "wasting water" Golf courses use 3x as much water... https://t.co/SBCcINKZci

    1.0K1181051870K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.0x their median

    “I am the house now…. You can bet against me if you want.” - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

    1.1K657431148K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.3x their median

    Inflation above target. Fed Chair Warsh won't raise rates because the White House doesn't want him to. Bond vigilantes sending real rates higher, in protest of war in Iran & general lack of fiscal discipline. Treasury Sec Bessent buyback interventions failing. What a shit show.

    9405471263K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.3x their median

    Text no longer retained for this post.

    8391106640301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    The top will be when $META changes their ticker to $MUSE

    8451428265K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.6x their median

    *U.S. AND IRAN DISCUSSING MULTI-PHASE DEAL TO REOPEN STRAIT OF HORMUZ AND END U.S. BLOCKADE

    693475822120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.5x their median

    *PRESIDENT TRUMP ANNOUNCES U.S. AND DENMARK HAVE REACHED AGREEMENT TO GRANT UNITED STATES PERMANENT & EXCLUSIVE LIFETIME SECURITY CONTROL OVER GREENLAND Full statement from President Trump: "BREAKING NEWS: I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has entered into an Agreement with The Kingdom of Denmark, and Greenland, that gives the United States permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland, completely addressing ALL of our many U.S. concerns. There will be NO COST to the United States! At my direction, we worked with representatives of Denmark and Greenland to guarantee that the United States will FOREVER have the complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland in order to secure and defend the security of Greenland, and the United States of America. Additionally, from now on, no U.S. adversary can EVER have a base in Greenland, have a military presence in Greenland, or make sensitive investments in Greenland, without our express written approval. For over 100 years, Presidents have known the strategic importance of Greenland, but NONE of them were able to do anything about it. I am proud to be the President that permanently and conclusively addressed this very important situation. This is an “Infinite Life” Agreement, there is no end! We are very honored and proud of what has just taken place, and everything agreed to today will be cherished by the American People. We will immediately begin the process of developing a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland, of which there are many. We will work with the people of Greenland in its development and construction. This solution is a great one for the United States of America, Denmark, Greenland, and all of our Allies. We look forward to working with the wonderful people of Denmark and Greenland toward a magnificent future with respect to this large, and highly strategic, parcel of land. We will be very protective of it! This is a dream come true for the United States of America, one that is very important, historic, and special. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

    680595915114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 321 interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.679% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

What is Stock Talk's engagement rate on X?
Stock Talk (@stocktalkweekly) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 64 original posts from the last 30 days against 400,498 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, Stock Talk sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @stocktalkweekly have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @stocktalkweekly post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going