Back to @stevewoz's profile

Steve Wozniak engagement report

@stevewoz - 3.7M followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 3.7M followers
Per impression
0.582%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
1.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
278
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 278 interactions against 3.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.582% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 67x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Steve Wozniak's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Steve Wozniak sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 6, 202367x their median

    Can we get 500 retweets on this? This is one hell of an ad from the Democrat running for US Senate in North Dakota. The question is whether people will watch it and share it. https://t.co/twqu3LjaC7

    21K16K6411.6K2.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202679x their median

    I’ve decided it’s time to have a little more fun on X this year! 😄⚡ I get to speak at some amazing events, meet fascinating people, hear great stories, and occasionally find myself in places I never expected to be. So I figured… why not share some of those moments here? And there’s more! I’m also excited to launch my new merch. A little Woz spirit, a little fun, and hopefully a few things bring a smile to your face. This is just the beginning. More adventures, more stories, and more surprises to come! https://t.co/eoTmcRRVh4

    20K9748192012.2M viewsView on X
  • May 17, 202617x their median

    Great Willie Nile concert last night. Lots of stories and content about family and life. Going to another of his concerts tonight in Felton. https://t.co/vsq9POlwni

    4.1K25020921249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202212x their median

    Today is my 73nd birthday, meaning I’m now 72 years old. I have to count 0 as a birthday too. 72 is a poetic number. 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 (2 ^ 3) * (3 ^ 2) Actually, the Earth is in the same position around the sun as when I was born, tomorrow, August 12. See you next year!

    3.9K22735671View on X
  • Apr 29, 202415x their median

    I bought a Klein bottle from Acme Klein Bottles. Many of the best things in my life, that got me here, aren't super functional but they are cool. https://t.co/ifImRlYXxi. I also bought a small Klein bottle earring for Janet. https://t.co/1lAM350tPY

    3.7K18218061366K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202612x their median

    It’s been 50 years since I built the Apple I. We’re sharing a little of that history to help Inspiring Children Foundation, a cause Janet and I care about very much. This collection is limited to 3,000 garments. https://t.co/1rFkJizG3L https://t.co/wK5deBTEqq

    3.1K24411123131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20268.6x their median

    https://t.co/swuLKCk9pK

    2.2K1256529300K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 20234.8x their median

    https://t.co/BjnomAf17o

    1.2K53449125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20264.5x their median

    I had a sequence of early Tesla Model 3’s, over maybe a decade. Each of them would eventually start pulling to the right. I may have taken them in a dozen times and the service center in Sunnyvale would make it better for a while. But my Tesla's would start getting worse and worse at pulling to the right again. After the better part of a decade I looked online and there were tons of complains about this model pulling to the right and none about it pulling to the left. This meant that there was a fault in the design. But Tesla never fixed it. Finally, after close to a decade, the Tesla service center in Sunnyvale said that there was a suspension part they could replace to fix it. After that replacement, the problem stopped. But the warrantee had finally run out so I had to pay for this ‘real’ fix. They never did it while the car was under warrantee. https://t.co/dTUW9bk2tx

    96312615017148K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20264.1x their median

    Thank you, Supabase, for such an incredible event! I had a wonderful time meeting everyone and sharing stories. So glad you’re enjoying my Woz merch, too—it makes me smile seeing you wear it! 😊 https://t.co/krvvL126Bt

    1.0K84307181K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 278 interactions against 3.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.582% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 67x its own typical post.

What is Steve Wozniak's engagement rate on X?
Steve Wozniak (@stevewoz) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,690,960 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Steve Wozniak sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @stevewoz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @stevewoz post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going