stevenmarkryan engagement report
@stevenmarkryan - 462K followers on X
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 346 interactions against 462K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 52% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
stevenmarkryan's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.076%, stevenmarkryan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 105 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 19, 202622x their median
The sex difference in throwing is one of the largest behavioral sex differences ever measured. While training matters, the disparity appears to be mostly biological. Yet Anne Fausto-Sterling argues in favor of pure socialization while ignoring a mountain of evidence to the contrary. Few scholars claim to deny biology outright, with most agreeing that nature and nurture interact. In practice, however, they routinely reject biological explanations in favor of comparatively implausible environmental ones. They pay lip service to biology, but never actually allow it to explain anything. This new long read by professors Robert Deaner and Mike Lombardo examines the science of throwing, hunting, and combat, and ask a simple question: What evidence would actually be allowed to count as evidence for an innate sex difference? Read the free article on @RealLastStand below. 🔗https://t.co/HOT59TDQhE
- Aug 15, 202617x their median
JUST IN: Elon Musk says people "really don't" understand how much compute the world needs
- Sep 16, 202615x their median
• Flashback: Elon Musk Explaining SpaceX In 2008 So long ago he needed a name tag 😂 https://t.co/bNFQF0fxxR
- Sep 3, 202613x their median
The future has arrived. https://t.co/WeRUjsn1nk
- Aug 11, 202611x their median
Elon Musk says in 4-5 years, AI will be 99% of the value of @SpaceX. "And the value of SpaceX will be some astronomical number." Hold onto your $SPCX stock for as long as you can. https://t.co/DRZaJmHDLY
- Sep 18, 20265.8x their median
Grok bot is so good man.
- Aug 31, 20265.2x their median
• Did SpaceX Just Checkmate An Entire Industry? https://t.co/xyncj2ReSQ
- Sep 4, 20264.6x their median
I condensed Tesla's Cybercab Launch Event Today into 4 seconds to save you time: https://t.co/uptQs6ybyW
- Sep 4, 20263.8x their median
Full presentation by Tesla CyberCab and Robotaxi team!! https://t.co/OxWXYwh4UW
- Sep 3, 20263.7x their median
• Elon & Tesla Prove Skeptics Wrong (again) • $1 Trillion Terafab Is NEXT https://t.co/8pWXsAMbs8
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 346 interactions against 462K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 52% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is stevenmarkryan's engagement rate on X?
- stevenmarkryan (@stevenmarkryan) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 462,420 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.076%, stevenmarkryan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @stevenmarkryan have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @stevenmarkryan post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.