Back to @stella_immanuel's profile

Dr. Stella Immanuel MD engagement report

@stella_immanuel - 354K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 354K followers
Per impression
0.381%
7.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 354K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.381% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 2090x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Stella Immanuel MD's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Dr. Stella Immanuel MD sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 93 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 20262090x their median

    I wish I could look back and say I was wrong. I wished more people had listened. I was bashed and ridiculed for having the audacity to say Covid was treatable and people did not have to die. I am honored to have been given the privilege to treat hundreds of thousands and save lives. Fauci is the Impersonification of evil. Humanity stay alert. Be prepared and not scared. Join our email on https://t.co/Zjor0tbugV and stay connected. The battle is not over

    46K11K1.5K300675K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261547x their median

    Despite being a private citizen with no public health role, Bill Gates was involved in high-level COVID briefings and played a direct role in shaping America’s pandemic response. https://t.co/IhYTsLS26q

    29K11K3.1K680507K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20261086x their median

    To all the vaccinated people telling the unvaccinated to just "pipe down": Fuck No. No collective in history was as brutally targeted and demonised as the unjabbed. You didn't just ostracise us - you relished the cruelty. So, take this as a 'Trigger Warning.' But I speak from a very unique position of being unjabbed and dedicating years to the jab injured and bereaved, and I couldn't care less who I may offend with the truth after years of self-censorship. I'm sorry it's long, but I can't squeeze seven years of history and brutal truths into a three-minute video. You want us to stay quiet, you want to bury the past, but I know for a fact that I am not the only person who feels this way. You can't hide behind the few who stayed silent. A colossal majority of you took part in the cruelty, and now you want to rewrite history to cover your tracks. We must never forget what one side openly demanded. I'll not let that happen... The vaccinated cheered as people were stripped of their livelihoods, thrown out of their jobs, and demanded they be cut off from government benefits. They pushed for heavy fines, legal penalties, forced medical costs, and stricter quarantine and lockdowns for the unvaccinated. Across the world, the unvaccinated were systematically locked out of society - barred from planes, trains, schools, and universities. Doors to theatres, restaurants, sporting events, festivals, concerts and even places of worship - were shut to the unvaccinated. The vaccinated were cheerleaders for this. The vaccinated wanted a campaign of public humiliation. They demanded that people be named, shamed, and socially ostracised by their own friends and family. They even argued hospitals should turn the unvaccinated away, and called for them to be rounded up into concentration camps. Ultimately, they wished for severe illness and death upon them, callously whispering, "They got what they deserved." But... we weren't the ones dying. Yet they labelled us "super-spreaders" - hilarious, since their jab was supposed to protect them. They called us "covidiots." They screamed about a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." That happened. Worldwide. Daily. For years. To the good few jabbed, the injured, and the bereaved who fight for humanity instead of self: your unity with the unjabbed matters. You are fighting for truth and justice for everyone, not just one 'side.' Respect. And to the injured plaintiffs taking Bill Gates to court in the Netherlands: you and lawyer Peter Stassen are true heroes. By exposing the beast and speaking the TRUTH, you are fighting a battle for all of us.

    22K6.5K1.8K576506K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 2026223x their median

    Google is about to conduct one of the LARGEST open-air biological experiments in U.S. HISTORY. 64 MILLION bacteria-infected mosquitoes are set to be released into Florida and California — potentially causing irreversible ecosystem disruptions. This must be STOPPED. https://t.co/Cyv942mjkJ

    17K11K1.4K823273K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20261070x their median

    There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism ...except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism: ▪️ https://t.co/9PBis1NeN0 ▪️ https://t.co/BnGp3LHpNY ▪️ https://t.co/GZg2u91uyH ▪️ https://t.co/HxyJhJ9eTU ▪️ https://t.co/UxGxKAQhcJ ▪️ https://t.co/pMF2i9yH4L ▪️ https://t.co/0gN0fSNtKK ▪️ https://t.co/d3fELVQ3bO ▪️ https://t.co/nerRN2PiFm ▪️ https://t.co/z3Jr3j1L4T ▪️ https://t.co/dfXwUj6L37 ▪️ https://t.co/rsAb6yiTp6 ▪️ https://t.co/T7FGd5W39O ▪️ https://t.co/WB7eA9gfwb ▪️ https://t.co/CIApYvYcxV ▪️ https://t.co/gVt803ebzu ▪️ https://t.co/8aif6nRsWz ▪️ https://t.co/g8R2I7z9Rb ▪️ https://t.co/Ou4Op0TVgP Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism ▪️ https://t.co/cm2GtMLmYG ... and autism being listed in the inserts....

    20K9.2K3163531.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026551x their median

    https://t.co/niXJ0UaDFC

    12K3.2K2478373K viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 2025253x their median

    I will never forget these horrendous comments Jimmy Kimmel made, and neither should you. https://t.co/EBJ5Rgcudu

    5.3K1.4K232981.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026252x their median

    Operation Warp Speed started March 30, 2019. How did they know? https://t.co/5Ke90wjXTQ

    4.8K1.7K381152217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026215x their median

    Three Amish schools in New York are refusing to comply with the state’s vaccine mandates. ZERO of the children attending these schools have a chronic disease. More than 2 in 5 American children have at least one chronic health condition. We are being told that these Amish children are the public health threat because they don’t follow the recommended vaccine schedule. Yet they are extraordinarily healthier than the average child in the U.S.

    4.1K1.6K14885119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026135x their median

    Many big pharma programmed doctors are still parroting ‘there is no double blinded, placebo controlled’ study that shows hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin works for COVID. 100k plus patients later they are still screaming ‘double blinded double blinded’ like a broken 70s record player. Still in denial. Please show me the placebo controlled double blinded study that supports the safety and efficacy of the numerous vaccines we are injecting into our babies at the same time. Any study that shows the safety of giving 8 different antigenic material to a two month old at the same time. I’m waiting!!!!

    2.8K8241151825K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 354K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.381% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 2090x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Stella Immanuel MD's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Stella Immanuel MD (@stella_immanuel) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 353,516 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Dr. Stella Immanuel MD sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @stella_immanuel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @stella_immanuel post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going