Back to @steenbab's profile

Brett Steenbarger engagement report

@steenbab - 98K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 98K followers
Per impression
0.934%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
5.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
46
interactions (median)
Saved
0.236%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 98K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 4,160 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.934% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 209x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #ibdpartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brett Steenbarger's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,160 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Brett Steenbarger sits above the 25th percentile of the 40,288 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.013% to 0.082%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.441%
p902.07%
p99148.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 40,288 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 92,710 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.441%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile148.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%56K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%48K
05:00 UTC-4%46K
06:00 UTC-4%54K
07:00 UTC-4%58K
08:00 UTC-4%67K
09:00 UTC-4%78K
10:00 UTC-3%80K
11:00 UTC-3%87K
12:00 UTC-2%96K
13:00 UTC-2%105K
14:00 UTC-3%108K
15:00 UTC-2%112K
16:00 UTC-3%109K
17:00 UTC-3%101K
18:00 UTC-2%94K
19:00 UTC-2%89K
20:00 UTC-1%83K
21:00 UTC-1%73K
22:00 UTC-1%63K
23:00 UTC-1%57K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%249K
Monday+1%319K
Tuesday-3%339K
Wednesday-4%292K
Thursday-2%259K
Friday-3%270K
Saturday+3%243K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 2026209x their median

    This is absolutely incredible. Corporate America is currently on pace for the biggest earnings beat EVER recorded. S&P 500 companies are beating earnings per share estimates by an aggregate +29.2%. To put this into perspective, the 5-year average stands at +7.0%, which is already historically high. In other words, S&P 500 companies are now beating already high expectations by ~4.2 TIMES the 5-year average. On top of this, the blended net margin for the S&P 500 is up to 16.9%, also an all time high. Even if you removed Alphabet’s $98 billion gain from unrealized equity investments and Amazon’s $53 billion gain from Anthropic, S&P 500 earnings growth would STILL be +32.0% year-over-year. We are in the midst of the largest investment boom in history.

    8.1K836501172924K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202676x their median

    If I start a new X account to dig deep into trading, is there anyone to follow me. I need at least 30 ❤️s to be encouraged.

    3.3K181473105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202647x their median

    S&P 500 earnings are now expected to surge 32% in 2026, more than double the 15% growth expected at the start of the year. We’ve never seen earnings growth this strong outside of post-recession rebounds. This time, there was no recession. Just an unprecedented AI-driven boom. https://t.co/YRsnxoWDgx

    1.7K29212647161K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202636x their median

    The S&P 500's Dividend Yield has moved down to 1.04%, the lowest level in history. https://t.co/axSGEECsTd

    1.2K25912534127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202620x their median

    Leveraged ETFs are now driving markets. Leveraged ETFs now account for a record 16% of total global ETF daily trading value. This is despite representing only ~$250 billion, or 1%, of the total ~$22 trillion global ETF industry. This comes as 30-day average trading volume in leveraged ETFs has tripled since January, to a record ~$70 billion in June. Furthermore, long-leveraged ETFs are seeing ~$43 billion in average daily turnover, compared to ~$18 billion in short-leveraged funds. Meanwhile, AI-related long-leveraged ETFs now account for a record 58% of total exposure across long-leveraged ETFs, up from 26% in 2022. Among single-stock long-leveraged ETFs, memory stocks alone account for 48% of total exposure. This market is seeing massive amounts of leverage.

    735898031221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202620x their median

    Tech Stocks on track for a yearly inflow of $216 Billion, completely smashing ever other year in history 🚨 🚨 https://t.co/Ez48dTxapl

    7201224325122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.9x their median

    Most traders think discipline means having the strength to take a trade. Sometimes it does. But discipline is also: Not chasing. Not revenge trading. Not moving your stop. Not trading when there is no setup. Sometimes the most disciplined trade is no trade at all.

    133172919.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.0x their median

    Something that took me a long time to realize, the wealthiest hedge fund managers are not actually doing the vast majority of the trading/investing themselves. Instead, they focus on the business while hiring teams to do the investing/trading for them.

    12429113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.9x their median

    With the market on FIRE🔥🔥🔥📈📈📈 there is no better time to watch yesterdays podcast. https://t.co/96akQmKsGU https://t.co/mT9YvwqDWj 2 weeks FREE #IBDPartner @marketsurge https://t.co/082eydVc2b

    7096324K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Here is something I wrote in 2010, reflecting what I had learned about trading psychology from @VicNiederhoffer. Markets are always changing and our emotional reactions to those changes are valuable pieces of information that can help us adapt: https://t.co/uQGJKSQyvA https://t.co/Gt3DxKQ2ds

    5011515.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ibdpartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 98K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 4,160 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.934% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 209x its own typical post.

What is Brett Steenbarger's engagement rate on X?
Brett Steenbarger (@steenbab) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 97,612 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Brett Steenbarger sits above the 25th percentile of the 40,288 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @steenbab have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,160 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @steenbab post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going