Back to @statsjamie's profile

Jamie Jenkins engagement report

@statsjamie - 108K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 108K followers
Per impression
1.27%
3.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
43
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 956 interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jamie Jenkins's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Jamie Jenkins sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,805 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,448 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 360 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202622x their median

    🚨 DIESEL IS HITTING £2 A LITRE The UK average is now 198.3p a litre, and many forecourts have already passed £2. My local is one of them. And as prices rise, the Treasury automatically takes more VAT. Diesel has risen almost 56p a litre since the end of February, adding roughly 9p more VAT per litre. At £2 a litre, around 86p is tax, including fuel duty and VAT. Drivers are being hammered by a global energy shock while the Government collects more tax from every litre. Should some of that extra VAT be given back to motorists?

    72613785831K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20265.5x their median

    🚨 ENERGY BILLS COULD HIT £2,000 A YEAR! Successive governments have overseen the decline of Britain's domestic energy production, leaving us exposed to global energy shocks. Energy security is as important as defence. We can't secure our borders or our energy supply. What is government actually delivering?

    161482513.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.1x their median

    🚨 TAXES ARE RISING. SPENDING IS RISING FASTER. Britain borrowed £18.3bn in August, 19% more than a year ago. But the bigger story is spending. Receipts are £1.1bn above forecast. Central government spending is £7.4bn above forecast. Borrowing is £8.1bn above forecast. Britain’s public finances have a spending problem

    8642432.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20262.4x their median

    🚨 BURNHAM SCRAPS STARMER’S PLANS TO CURB JURY TRIALS Victory for common sense. Another controversial policy created under Starmer has been axed by Burnham. The new government seems to be spending an awful lot of time clearing up the mess left behind by the old one.

    7881613.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.2x their median

    Britain looks different when you follow the data. I write Stat of the Nation: plain-English analysis of politics, the economy and public services - without the spin. Subscribe free: https://t.co/iiEZZ3BGT6

    6725309.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.6x their median

    Ex-Reform MS Sarah Cooper-Lessad has told Walescast that she voted Remain in 2016 and wants Welsh independence

    46710416K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    🚨 ONE IN, ONE OUT IS DEAD. More than 1,500 people were sent back to France. Just under 1,500 came to the UK. At around £56,000 per return, that implies roughly £84 million spent for virtually no net reduction. I discussed the numbers with @Iromg 👇 https://t.co/WDHjEULO7N

    3310403.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    🚨 TWO SMALL BOAT ARRIVALS CHARGED OVER AN ALLEGED TERROR PLOT Two Iranian nationals have been charged with terrorism offences over an alleged plot targeting Manchester’s Jewish community. Both men arrived in the UK by small boat, one in 2020, the other in 2023. One was subsequently granted asylum, while the other still had an asylum application outstanding. They have been charged, not convicted, and proceedings are now active. Whatever your wider view on immigration, this case puts border security, identity checks and screening of people arriving illegally firmly back in the spotlight. Are our current border security arrangements good enough?

    3010213.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    🚨 MOST PEOPLE IN WALES STILL OPPOSE INDEPENDENCE Rhun ap Iorwerth says there is “no turning back” on Welsh independence. But the latest Survation polling for YesCymru puts it at: 🏴 32% YES 🇬🇧 68% NO And there’s a huge fiscal question. Latest ONS figures show Wales had an estimated £22.8 BILLION fiscal deficit in 2024/25. That’s a gap of £7,149 per person between public spending and revenue raised in Wales. Plaid Cymru now runs the Welsh Government. The NHS is struggling. Education needs improving. The economy needs growing. Should they focus on running Wales before trying to break up the UK?

    268803.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    Are we taxing wealth out of Britain? Super-rich UK residents with around £121bn of combined wealth have left Britain or loosened their UK ties since 2024. City AM Why does that matter? Because the top 1% are projected to account for 26.6% of all Income Tax in 2026/27. Many wealthy people also invest, build businesses and create jobs. If Britain becomes less attractive to them, we risk losing future investment as well as tax revenue. The real question is: Are we raising more tax, or shrinking the tax base?

    269502.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 956 interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Jamie Jenkins's engagement rate on X?
Jamie Jenkins (@statsjamie) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 108,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Jamie Jenkins sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @statsjamie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @statsjamie post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going