Back to @sport_tvppl's profile

TVP SPORT engagement report

@sport_tvppl - 337K followers on X

Measured over 109 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 337K followers
Per impression
0.285%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
23
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 109 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.285% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 109 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.4K interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

Measured over 109 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TVP SPORT's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, TVP SPORT sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 2026149x their median

    17-letni Norbert Gzowski obronił trzy rzuty karne w konkursie jedenastek i pomógł Zniczowi Pruszków wyeliminować Cracovię z STS Pucharu Polski! 🔥 Co za moment dla tego chłopaka! 😍 https://t.co/ltgm2nUorM

    3.2K1144116134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202636x their median

    Obronił trzy rzuty karne, ale ma nadzieję, że... kibice wybaczą mu pierwsze błędy 😅 Norbert Gzowski podzielił się z nami wrażeniami po meczu z Cracovią i zdradził też, na jakiego rywala liczy w kolejnej rundzie 👀 Cała rozmowa 👉 https://t.co/jQG2NLUCEi https://t.co/wRwXwTmzIg

    7892713441K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202634x their median

    Wojciech Szczęsny łagodnie uśmiechnięty 😎 https://t.co/5F3IlDMc6q

    758135022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202618x their median

    Korona Kielce wyeliminowała Widzew Łódź z STS Pucharu Polski! Gola na wagę zwycięstwa wypracowali rezerwowi. 18-letni Konrad Ciszek dośrodkował do o dwa lata starszego Daniela Bąka! https://t.co/TbDmqUPSRm

    38694630K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202612x their median

    🎙️ @RafalRostkowski w programie FUTBOL TOTALNY: Brak refleksji i zrozumienia tej sytuacji przez pana Siemieńca oznacza, że on tej kary potrzebuje. On potrzebuje łopatologicznego wytłumaczenia dlaczego to jest poważna sprawa. Przypomnijmy, że afera korupcyjna i mnóstwo czynów korupcyjnych zaczynało się od szukania kontaktu, różnego rodzaju uprzejmości i małych próśb. Co się działo później to już jest osobna sprawa. 🔴 📲 OGLĄDAJ ▶️ https://t.co/aJDH3og8Bi

    2352318415K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202611x their median

    "Polonia zawsze była tym klubem trochę sponiewieranym, pokrzywdzonym, ale myślę, że czas z tym skończyć"... Premiera reportażu "Zamknąć krąg. Odbudowa Polonii Warszawa" już 10 października o 10:35 w TVP Sport! https://t.co/NnLteHJ0ct

    222251514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.8x their median

    Podpowiadamy Janowi Urbanowi! 11 piłkarzy, z których selekcjoner jeszcze nie skorzystał. Kto zasłużył na swoją szansę? I od razu wyjaśniamy 👉 https://t.co/NX7NkEvnXB https://t.co/24WMe50lkZ

    169229322K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.7x their median

    🗣️ Michał Żewłakow: Jeżeli my na kolejne dwa mecze powołamy podobną grupę piłkarzy i wystawimy ich na tych samych pozycjach, to eliminacje do mistrzostw Europy rozpoczniemy nie wiedząc nic albo z nowym selekcjonerem. 🔴📲 OGLĄDAJ 👉 https://t.co/9dzxliZ7CK https://t.co/5qQuxUY47V

    12514110K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.5x their median

    🗣️ Maciej Iwański: Nie rozumiem Jana Urbana, mówiącego, że my po prostu mamy przeciętnych piłkarzy. Który selekcjoner długofalowo odniósł jakikolwiek sukces "strzelając do własnej szatni"? 🔴📲 OGLĄDAJ 👉 https://t.co/9dzxliYzNc https://t.co/Mgdn17SD4N

    103320010K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.7x their median

    Organizator rozgrywek wyraża "DEZAPROBATĘ". Więcej tutaj 👉 https://t.co/NgFrskxWZ2 https://t.co/1jPlGjolie

    75923112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 109 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.285% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 109 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.4K interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

What is TVP SPORT's engagement rate on X?
TVP SPORT (@sport_tvppl) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 109 original posts from the last 30 days against 336,915 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, TVP SPORT sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @sport_tvppl have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @sport_tvppl post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going