Back to @spin9's profile

spin9 engagement report

@spin9 - 405K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.458%
of 405K followers
Per impression
1.32%
140K views on a typical post
Reach
34.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
41 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.458%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #appleevent.

Compared with accounts its own size

spin9's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.458%, spin9 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202645x their median

    ✌️ https://t.co/A7LsYy0aJy

    36K47K5941.3K1.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202621x their median

    กอดอุปกรณ์ไอทีของตัวเองกันแน่นๆ นะครับ อย่าตก อย่าพัง สภาวะแรมแพงแบบนี้ ของใหม่แพงขึ้นเยอะแน่นอน

    14K30K1686173.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202618x their median

    สัมผัสแรก iPhone Duo — ครั้งแรกของ iPhone จอพับบบบ https://t.co/inxdqGQrQK

    16K17K1165185.6M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20268.4x their median

    Apple ขึ้นราคาสินค้ารอบนี้ถือว่าหนักนะ เท่าที่รู้ Apple ไม่เคยปรับขึ้นราคาสินค้ากลางทางแบบนี้มาก่อน ปกติแล้ว Apple จะยึดราคาเปิดตัวยาวไปจนกว่าจะมีรุ่นใหม่ออก ที่คุ้นเคยกันว่า Apple ขึ้นราคา (หรือลดราคา) ในตลาดนอกสหรัฐฯ จะเป็นปัจจัยเรื่องอัตราแลกเปลี่ยน ที่ขึ้นลงตามค่าเงินของแต่ละประเทศ แต่ไม่เคยปรับราคาสินค้าที่ต้นทาง ที่เป็นราคา US Dollar มาก่อน แถมรอบนี้ปรับเยอะด้วย ยังดีที่รอบนี้ปรับขึ้นโดยเว้นกลุ่ม iPhone ไว้ แต่ถ้ามาทรงนี้ iPhone รุ่นใหม่ของปีนี้แพงสนั่นแน่นอน

    4.7K13K1051551.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20267.8x their median

    Apple ขึ้นราคาสินค้าในกลุ่ม Mac, iPad และ Home Device ตัวอย่างรายละเอียดการปรับขึ้นราคา (ราคาเริ่มต้น) - MacBook Neo (256GB) เดิม 19,900 บาท > 24,900 บาท - MacBook Air M5 (512GB) เดิม 36,900 บาท > 44,900 บาท - MacBook Pro M5 (1TB) เดิม 54,900 บาท > 69,900 บาท - MacBook Pro 14 นิ้ว M5 Pro เดิม 74,900 บาท > 87,900 บาท - MacBook Pro 16 นิ้ว M5 Pro เดิม 92,900 บาท > 104,900 บาท - iMac M4 เดิม 44,900 บาท > 52,900 บาท - iPad Pro รุ่น 11 นิ้ว เดิม 35,900 บาท > 42,900 บาท - iPad Air M4 11 นิ้ว เดิม 21,900 บาท > 27,900 บาท - iPad mini เดิม 17,900 บาท > 21,900 บาท ช่วงสัปดาห์ที่ผ่านมา Tim Cook ให้สัมภาษณ์กับ WSJ ว่าจากวิกฤติ RAM แพงทำให้ Apple ต้องขึ้นราคาสินค้า อย่างหลีกเลี่ยงไม่ได้

    4.2K11K1671.3K2.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.8x their median

    เปิดตัว iPhone 18 Pro อัปเกรดชิพเป็น A20 Pro 4 สี - ดำ Deep Black - เงิน Silver - ฟ้า Glacier - แดง Burgundy #AppleEvent https://t.co/ai8KzUGL87

    4.8K11K324231.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20267.1x their median

    “Galaxy Z Fold8” ไซส์ใหม่ พับใหม่ น่าใช้ขนาดไหน ตามไปดูรีวิวกันนะครับ 👉 https://t.co/4Q65S1irw2 #GalaxyUnpacked https://t.co/lbhwQu2iS5

    7.0K6.0K10410999K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20265.5x their median

    Facebook และ Instagram ล่มทั่วโลกเลยรึ

    4.7K6.8K135142576K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20265.4x their median

    อยากเห็นเคาน์เตอร์ประชาสัมพันธ์ราคาสิบล้านแล้วอะ น่าจะสวยยย https://t.co/pfRS6XQAYR

    3.0K8.3K7880468K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.0x their median

    ภูวิน @phuwintang ชอบอะไรใน #GalaxyUnpacked รอบนี้? https://t.co/B24zTxpKI1

    6.1K5.0K564383K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#appleevent

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.458%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

What is spin9's engagement rate on X?
spin9 (@spin9) has an engagement rate of 0.458%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 404,572 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.458%, spin9 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @spin9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @spin9 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going